Which has the lower trailing P/E, HL or MAS?

MAS has the lower trailing P/E: HL trades at 35.10 and MAS at 15.71. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HL or MAS?

Over the past five years, HL grew revenue faster — HL at a 14.42% CAGR versus MAS at 1.02%.

Does HL or MAS pay a bigger dividend?

HL yields 0.09% and MAS yields 1.86% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is HL or MAS more profitable?

HL runs the higher net margin — HL at 20.83% versus MAS at 11.61%.

How have HL and MAS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, HL delivered 11.99% and MAS delivered 8.82% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Hecla Mining Company (HL) vs Masco Corporation (MAS)

A side-by-side comparison of Hecla Mining Company and Masco Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Hecla Mining Company

$11.54B

$17.20Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MAS

Masco Corporation

$13.48B

$68.36Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — HL vs MAS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

HL +207.8% (+11.9%/yr)MAS +135.8% (+9.0%/yr)HL compounded faster over this window

HL MAS

HL vs MAS: by the numbers

•MAS is the larger company ($13.48B vs $11.54B market cap).
•MAS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (15.71 vs 35.10 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•HL converts more revenue to profit (20.83% vs 11.61% net margin).
•HL grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.42% vs 1.02% CAGR).
•MAS pays the higher dividend yield (1.86% vs 0.09%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HL	MAS
P/E ratio	35.10	15.71
Forward P/E	23.64	15.09
PEG ratio	N/A	1.60
P/S ratio	7.20	1.77
P/B ratio	4.31	N/A
EV / EBITDA	12.17	10.96
FCF yield	4.47%	10.78%

Profitability

Metric	HL	MAS
Gross margin	43.72%	36.93%
Operating margin	37.71%	17.68%
Net margin	20.83%	11.61%
ROE	12.47%	N/A
ROIC	18.37%	27.22%

Dividends

Metric	HL	MAS
Dividend yield	0.09%	1.86%
Payout ratio	3.06%	29.20%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HL	MAS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.42%	1.02%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	9.83%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	28.20%	13.25%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	25.79%	6.05%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HL or MAS?: MAS has the lower trailing P/E: HL trades at 35.10 and MAS at 15.71. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HL or MAS?: Over the past five years, HL grew revenue faster — HL at a 14.42% CAGR versus MAS at 1.02%.
Does HL or MAS pay a bigger dividend?: HL yields 0.09% and MAS yields 1.86% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is HL or MAS more profitable?: HL runs the higher net margin — HL at 20.83% versus MAS at 11.61%.
How have HL and MAS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, HL delivered 11.99% and MAS delivered 8.82% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HL analysis Full MAS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Hecla Mining P/E ratio Masco P/E ratio Hecla Mining dividend yield Masco dividend yield Hecla Mining ROE Masco ROE Hecla Mining operating margin Masco operating margin Hecla Mining revenue growth Masco revenue growth Hecla Mining free cash flow Masco free cash flow

Hecla Mining & Masco appear in these rankings

Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.