HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE) vs SEALSQ Corp (LAES)
A side-by-side comparison of HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. and SEALSQ Corp across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
HIVE
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.
$2.98TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
LAES
SEALSQ Corp
$2.37TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — HIVE vs LAES
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 3yHIVE -2.9% (-1.0%/yr)LAES -78.2% (-39.8%/yr)HIVE compounded faster over this window
HIVE LAES
HIVE vs LAES: by the numbers
- •HIVE is the larger company ($814M vs $338M market cap).
- •Both run net losses; HIVE's is the smaller (-98.01% vs -187.34% net margin).
- •HIVE grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.90% vs 3.66% CAGR).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | HIVE | LAES |
|---|---|---|
| P/S ratio | 2.47 | 12.60 |
| P/B ratio | 1.93 | 0.49 |
| EV / EBITDA | 269.42 | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | HIVE | LAES |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | -21.00% | 47.28% |
| Operating margin | -40.22% | -218.08% |
| Net margin | -98.01% | -187.34% |
| ROE | -76.35% | -7.41% |
| ROIC | -25.08% | -8.35% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | HIVE | LAES |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 26.90% | 3.66% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -26.50% | N/A |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, HIVE or LAES?
- Over the past five years, HIVE grew revenue faster — HIVE at a 26.90% CAGR versus LAES at 3.66%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
HIVE Digital Technologies ROESEALSQ ROEHIVE Digital Technologies operating marginSEALSQ operating marginHIVE Digital Technologies revenue growthSEALSQ revenue growthHIVE Digital Technologies free cash flowSEALSQ free cash flow
HIVE Digital Technologies & SEALSQ appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 3, 2026.