Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) vs NIO Inc. (NIO)

A side-by-side comparison of Hasbro, Inc. and NIO Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 1, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnHAS vs NIO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y
HAS +22.4%NIO -26.1%HAS compounded faster
02004006008001kStart $1002020202220242026$122$74
HAS NIO

HAS vs NIO: by the numbers

  • HAS is the larger company ($13.29B vs $12.11B market cap).
  • HAS is profitable (15.99% net margin) while NIO runs a net loss (-8.84%).
  • NIO grew revenue faster over the past five years (33.07% vs -3.48% CAGR).
  • HAS pays a dividend (2.98% yield), while NIO has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricHASNIO
P/E ratio16.90N/A
Forward P/E15.31N/A
P/S ratio2.700.85
P/B ratio18.4219.25
PEG ratio0.20N/A
EV / EBITDA12.36N/A
FCF yield9.03%N/A

Profitability

MetricHASNIO
Gross margin70.28%15.74%
Operating margin23.86%-16.89%
Net margin15.99%-8.84%
ROE108.89%-200.85%
ROIC25.14%-26.94%

Dividends

MetricHASNIO
Dividend yield2.98%N/A

Growth (annualized)

MetricHASNIO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)-3.48%33.07%
FCF CAGR (5Y)-0.49%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)2.76%-35.77%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, HAS or NIO?
Over the past five years, NIO grew revenue faster — HAS at a -3.48% CAGR versus NIO at 33.07%.
Does HAS or NIO pay a bigger dividend?
HAS pays a dividend (2.98% yield), while NIO has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is HAS or NIO more profitable?
HAS runs the higher net margin — HAS at 15.99% versus NIO at -8.84%.
How have HAS and NIO total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, HAS delivered 4.86% and NIO delivered -35.77% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 1, 2026.