Which has the lower trailing P/E, HAS or MGM?

HAS has the lower trailing P/E: HAS trades at 16.49 and MGM at 27.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HAS or MGM?

Over the past five years, MGM grew revenue faster — HAS at a -3.48% CAGR versus MGM at 22.64%.

Does HAS or MGM pay a bigger dividend?

HAS pays a dividend (3.05% yield), while MGM is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is HAS or MGM more profitable?

HAS runs the higher net margin — HAS at 15.99% versus MGM at 2.40%.

How have HAS and MGM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, HAS delivered 4.52% and MGM delivered 6.84% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) vs MGM Resorts International (MGM)

A side-by-side comparison of Hasbro, Inc. and MGM Resorts International across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HAS

Hasbro, Inc.

$13.08B

$92.72Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Aug 7, 2026, 12:29 PM EDT

MGM

MGM Resorts International

$11.20B

$44.51Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Aug 7, 2026, 12:29 PM EDT

Total return — HAS vs MGM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

HAS +1064.4%MGM +364.8%HAS compounded faster

HAS MGM

HAS vs MGM: by the numbers

•HAS is the larger company ($13.08B vs $11.20B market cap).
•HAS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.49 vs 27.09 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•HAS converts more revenue to profit (15.99% vs 2.40% net margin).
•MGM grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.64% vs -3.48% CAGR).
•HAS pays a dividend (3.05% yield), while MGM is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HAS	MGM
P/E ratio	16.49	27.09
Forward P/E	14.91	23.96
P/S ratio	2.64	0.65
P/B ratio	18.62	4.58
PEG ratio	0.20	N/A
EV / EBITDA	12.36	18.46
FCF yield	9.24%	14.51%

Profitability

Metric	HAS	MGM
Gross margin	70.28%	44.16%
Operating margin	23.86%	5.73%
Net margin	15.99%	2.40%
ROE	112.76%	16.96%
ROIC	25.14%	2.65%

Dividends

Metric	HAS	MGM
Dividend yield	3.05%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HAS	MGM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-3.48%	22.64%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-7.41%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	0.73%	27.93%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	2.57%	2.35%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HAS or MGM?: HAS has the lower trailing P/E: HAS trades at 16.49 and MGM at 27.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HAS or MGM?: Over the past five years, MGM grew revenue faster — HAS at a -3.48% CAGR versus MGM at 22.64%.
Does HAS or MGM pay a bigger dividend?: HAS pays a dividend (3.05% yield), while MGM is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is HAS or MGM more profitable?: HAS runs the higher net margin — HAS at 15.99% versus MGM at 2.40%.
How have HAS and MGM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, HAS delivered 4.52% and MGM delivered 6.84% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HAS analysis Full MGM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Hasbro P/E ratio MGM Resorts International P/E ratio Hasbro dividend yield MGM Resorts International dividend yield Hasbro ROE MGM Resorts International ROE Hasbro operating margin MGM Resorts International operating margin Hasbro revenue growth MGM Resorts International revenue growth Hasbro free cash flow MGM Resorts International free cash flow

Hasbro & MGM Resorts International appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 6, 2026.