Which has the lower trailing P/E, HAS or LULU?

LULU has the lower trailing P/E: HAS trades at 16.90 and LULU at 9.63. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, HAS or LULU?

Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — HAS at a -3.48% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.

Does HAS or LULU pay a bigger dividend?

HAS pays a dividend (2.98% yield), while LULU has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is HAS or LULU more profitable?

HAS runs the higher net margin — HAS at 15.99% versus LULU at 13.03%.

How have HAS and LULU total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, HAS delivered 4.86% and LULU delivered 4.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) vs Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

A side-by-side comparison of Hasbro, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 31, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

HAS

Hasbro, Inc.

$13.29B

$93.94Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$13.50B

$118.87Consumer CyclicalAt close: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — HAS vs LULU

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 19y

HAS +422.2%LULU +749.1%LULU compounded faster

HAS LULU

HAS vs LULU: by the numbers

•LULU is the larger company ($13.50B vs $13.29B market cap).
•LULU trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.63 vs 16.90 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•HAS converts more revenue to profit (15.99% vs 13.03% net margin).
•LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.61% vs -3.48% CAGR).
•HAS pays a dividend (2.98% yield), while LULU has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HAS	LULU
P/E ratio	16.90	9.63
Forward P/E	15.31	9.11
P/S ratio	2.70	1.23
P/B ratio	18.42	2.84
PEG ratio	0.20	0.40
EV / EBITDA	12.36	5.61
FCF yield	9.03%	9.33%

Profitability

Metric	HAS	LULU
Gross margin	70.28%	55.70%
Operating margin	23.86%	18.21%
Net margin	15.99%	13.03%
ROE	108.89%	30.25%
ROIC	25.14%	22.70%

Dividends

Metric	HAS	LULU
Dividend yield	2.98%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HAS	LULU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-3.48%	17.61%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	24.02%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-0.49%	-1.88%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	2.76%	-21.55%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, HAS or LULU?: LULU has the lower trailing P/E: HAS trades at 16.90 and LULU at 9.63. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, HAS or LULU?: Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — HAS at a -3.48% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.
Does HAS or LULU pay a bigger dividend?: HAS pays a dividend (2.98% yield), while LULU has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is HAS or LULU more profitable?: HAS runs the higher net margin — HAS at 15.99% versus LULU at 13.03%.
How have HAS and LULU total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, HAS delivered 4.86% and LULU delivered 4.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HAS analysis Full LULU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Hasbro P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Hasbro dividend yield Lululemon Athletica dividend yield Hasbro ROE Lululemon Athletica ROE Hasbro operating margin Lululemon Athletica operating margin Hasbro revenue growth Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Hasbro free cash flow Lululemon Athletica free cash flow

Hasbro & Lululemon Athletica appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 31, 2026.