Which has grown faster, HAS or LULU?

Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — HAS at a -2.54% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.

Does HAS or LULU pay a bigger dividend?

HAS pays a dividend (3.30% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.

Is HAS or LULU more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — HAS at -4.60% versus LULU at 13.03%.

Which has been the better investment, HAS or LULU?

Over the past 10-year, LULU delivered the higher annualized total return — HAS at 3.30% versus LULU at 5.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) vs Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

LULU leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Hasbro, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

HAS

Hasbro, Inc.

$12.02B

$84.96Consumer Cyclical

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$13.39B

$116.21Consumer Cyclical

Total return — HAS vs LULU

growth of $100 · last 19y

HAS +202.8%LULU +742.0%LULU compounded faster

HAS LULU

HAS vs LULU: by the numbers

•LULU is the larger company ($13.39B vs $12.02B market cap).
•LULU is profitable (13.03% net margin) while HAS runs a net loss (-4.60%).
•LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.61% vs -2.54% CAGR).
•HAS pays a dividend (3.30% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.

Which is better, HAS or LULU?

Metric tally: HAS 4 · LULU 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthLULU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityHAS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	HAS	LULU
P/E ratio	—	9.41
Forward P/E	13.24	10.52●
P/S ratio	2.52	1.20●
P/B ratio	18.69	2.78●
PEG ratio	—	0.39
EV / EBITDA	46.60	5.39●
FCF yield	8.43%	9.54%●

Profitability

Metric	HAS	LULU
Gross margin	69.79%●	55.70%
Operating margin	24.04%●	18.21%
Net margin	-4.60%	13.03%●
ROE	-34.17%	30.25%●
ROIC	25.14%●	22.70%

Dividends

Metric	HAS	LULU
Dividend yield	3.30%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	HAS	LULU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-2.54%	17.61%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	7.96%	24.02%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	1.59%	7.36%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	2.00%●	-18.96%

Frequently asked

Which is better, HAS or LULU?: It depends on your goal. growth: LULU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: HAS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LULU leads 10 to 4.
Which has grown faster, HAS or LULU?: Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — HAS at a -2.54% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.
Does HAS or LULU pay a bigger dividend?: HAS pays a dividend (3.30% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.
Is HAS or LULU more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — HAS at -4.60% versus LULU at 13.03%.
Which has been the better investment, HAS or LULU?: Over the past 10-year, LULU delivered the higher annualized total return — HAS at 3.30% versus LULU at 5.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full HAS analysis Full LULU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Hasbro P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Hasbro dividend yield Lululemon Athletica dividend yield Hasbro ROE Lululemon Athletica ROE Hasbro operating margin Lululemon Athletica operating margin Hasbro revenue growth Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Hasbro free cash flow Lululemon Athletica free cash flow

Hasbro & Lululemon Athletica appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.