Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) vs Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)
A side-by-side comparison of Hasbro, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
HAS
Hasbro, Inc.
$89.65Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 10:05 AM EDT
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
$98.51Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 10:05 AM EDT
Total return — HAS vs LULU
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yHAS +57.7% (+4.7%/yr)LULU +49.6% (+4.1%/yr)HAS compounded faster over this window
HAS LULU
HAS vs LULU: by the numbers
- •HAS is the larger company ($12.64B vs $11.19B market cap).
- •LULU trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.09 vs 16.12 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •HAS converts more revenue to profit (15.99% vs 12.78% net margin).
- •LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.96% vs -3.48% CAGR).
- •HAS pays a dividend (3.06% yield), while LULU has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | HAS | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.12 | 8.09 |
| Forward P/E | 14.59 | 10.16 |
| P/S ratio | 2.54 | 1.01 |
| P/B ratio | 17.93 | 2.33 |
| EV / EBITDA | N/A | 4.76 |
| FCF yield | 9.60% | 12.11% |
Profitability
| Metric | HAS | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 70.28% | 56.11% |
| Operating margin | 23.86% | 17.76% |
| Net margin | 15.99% | 12.78% |
| ROE | 112.76% | 29.60% |
| ROIC | 19.09% | 20.81% |
Dividends
| Metric | HAS | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.06% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 50.36% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | HAS | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -3.48% | 14.96% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -7.41% | 24.02% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.73% | -1.88% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.68% | -25.29% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, HAS or LULU?
- LULU has the lower trailing P/E: HAS trades at 16.12 and LULU at 8.09. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, HAS or LULU?
- Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — HAS at a -3.48% CAGR versus LULU at 14.96%.
- Does HAS or LULU pay a bigger dividend?
- HAS pays a dividend (3.06% yield), while LULU has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is HAS or LULU more profitable?
- HAS runs the higher net margin — HAS at 15.99% versus LULU at 12.78%.
- How have HAS and LULU total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, HAS delivered 4.83% and LULU delivered 4.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Hasbro P/E ratioLululemon Athletica P/E ratioHasbro dividend yieldHasbro ROELululemon Athletica ROEHasbro operating marginLululemon Athletica operating marginHasbro revenue growthLululemon Athletica revenue growthHasbro free cash flowLululemon Athletica free cash flow
Hasbro & Lululemon Athletica appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.