Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) vs Li Auto Inc. (LI)

A side-by-side comparison of Hasbro, Inc. and Li Auto Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — HAS vs LI

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y
HAS +42.5% (+6.1%/yr)LI -35.1% (-6.9%/yr)HAS compounded faster over this window
50100150200250Start $100202120222023202420252026$142$65
HAS LI

HAS vs LI: by the numbers

  • •HAS is the larger company ($12.63B vs $10.80B market cap).
  • •HAS is profitable (15.99% net margin) while LI runs a net loss (-4.45%).
  • •LI grew revenue faster over the past five years (45.20% vs -3.48% CAGR).
  • •HAS pays a dividend (3.13% yield), while LI has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricHASLI
P/E ratio16.10N/A
Forward P/E14.58N/A
P/S ratio2.540.72
P/B ratio17.911.11
FCF yield9.61%N/A

Profitability

MetricHASLI
Gross margin70.28%13.54%
Operating margin23.86%-6.72%
Net margin15.99%-4.45%
ROE112.76%-6.87%
ROIC19.09%-6.61%

Dividends

MetricHASLI
Dividend yield3.13%N/A
Payout ratio50.36%N/A

Growth (annualized)

MetricHASLI
Revenue CAGR (5Y)-3.48%45.20%
FCF CAGR (5Y)0.73%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)4.20%-16.46%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, HAS or LI?
Over the past five years, LI grew revenue faster — HAS at a -3.48% CAGR versus LI at 45.20%.
Does HAS or LI pay a bigger dividend?
HAS pays a dividend (3.13% yield), while LI has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is HAS or LI more profitable?
HAS runs the higher net margin — HAS at 15.99% versus LI at -4.45%.
How have HAS and LI total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, HAS delivered 4.20% and LI delivered -16.46% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 3, 2026.