Halliburton Company (HAL) vs Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL)
TPL leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though HAL is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Halliburton Company and Texas Pacific Land Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — HAL vs TPL
growth of $100 · last 30yHAL +148.8%TPL +60480.4%TPL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
HAL TPL
HAL vs TPL: by the numbers
- •HAL is the larger company ($28.58B vs $27.30B market cap).
- •HAL trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.78 vs 54.27 P/E).
- •TPL converts more revenue to profit (60.03% vs 6.95% net margin).
- •TPL grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.67% vs 11.51% CAGR).
- •HAL pays the higher dividend yield (1.99% vs 0.61%).
Which is better, HAL or TPL?
Metric tally: HAL 7 · TPL 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueHAL(lower P/E)
GrowthTPL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeHAL(higher dividend yield)
QualityTPL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | HAL | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 18.78● | 54.27 |
| Forward P/E | 11.75● | 43.17 |
| P/S ratio | 1.29● | 32.55 |
| P/B ratio | 2.65● | 17.55 |
| PEG ratio | — | 6.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.50● | 39.30 |
| FCF yield | 5.84%● | 1.81% |
Profitability
| Metric | HAL | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 15.31% | 85.46%● |
| Operating margin | 11.31% | 74.42%● |
| Net margin | 6.95% | 60.03%● |
| ROE | 14.23% | 32.37%● |
| ROIC | 8.38% | 30.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | HAL | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.99%● | 0.61% |
| Payout ratio | 45.03% | 34.38% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | HAL | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.51% | 23.67%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.16% | 22.57%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.24% | 18.77%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 9.48% | 18.39%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, HAL or TPL?
- It depends on your goal. value: HAL (lower P/E); growth: TPL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: HAL (higher dividend yield); quality: TPL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TPL leads 9 to 7.
- Is HAL or TPL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, HAL is cheaper: HAL trades at a 18.78 P/E and TPL at 54.27.
- Which has grown faster, HAL or TPL?
- Over the past five years, TPL grew revenue faster — HAL at a 11.51% CAGR versus TPL at 23.67%.
- Does HAL or TPL pay a bigger dividend?
- HAL yields 1.99% and TPL yields 0.61% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is HAL or TPL more profitable?
- TPL runs the higher net margin — HAL at 6.95% versus TPL at 60.03%.
- Which has been the better investment, HAL or TPL?
- Over the past 10-year, TPL delivered the higher annualized total return — HAL at -0.56% versus TPL at 37.72%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Halliburton P/E ratioTexas Pacific Land P/E ratioHalliburton dividend yieldTexas Pacific Land dividend yieldHalliburton ROETexas Pacific Land ROEHalliburton operating marginTexas Pacific Land operating marginHalliburton revenue growthTexas Pacific Land revenue growthHalliburton free cash flowTexas Pacific Land free cash flow
Halliburton & Texas Pacific Land appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.