Which has the lower trailing P/E, H or LULU?

LULU has the lower trailing P/E: H trades at 216.72 and LULU at 10.41. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, H or LULU?

Over the past five years, H grew revenue faster — H at a 52.46% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.

Does H or LULU pay a bigger dividend?

H pays a dividend (0.34% yield), while LULU has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is H or LULU more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — H at 1.26% versus LULU at 13.03%.

How have H and LULU total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, H delivered 13.34% and LULU delivered 5.15% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) vs Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

A side-by-side comparison of Hyatt Hotels Corporation and Lululemon Athletica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Hyatt Hotels Corporation

$16.13B

$170.08Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Aug 10, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$14.51B

$127.80Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Aug 10, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — H vs LULU

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

H +247.7% (+13.3%/yr)LULU +65.4% (+5.2%/yr)H compounded faster over this window

H LULU

H vs LULU: by the numbers

•H is the larger company ($16.13B vs $14.51B market cap).
•LULU trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.41 vs 216.72 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LULU converts more revenue to profit (13.03% vs 1.26% net margin).
•H grew revenue faster over the past five years (52.46% vs 17.61% CAGR).
•H pays a dividend (0.34% yield), while LULU has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	H	LULU
P/E ratio	216.72	10.41
Forward P/E	N/A	9.85
P/S ratio	2.75	1.33
P/B ratio	5.20	3.08
EV / EBITDA	22.53	6.05
FCF yield	1.47%	8.62%

Profitability

Metric	H	LULU
Gross margin	11.20%	55.70%
Operating margin	9.76%	18.21%
Net margin	1.26%	13.03%
ROE	2.39%	30.25%
ROIC	-3.03%	22.70%

Dividends

Metric	H	LULU
Dividend yield	0.34%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	H	LULU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	52.46%	17.61%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	12.15%	24.02%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	34.37%	-1.88%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	19.00%	-20.63%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, H or LULU?: LULU has the lower trailing P/E: H trades at 216.72 and LULU at 10.41. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, H or LULU?: Over the past five years, H grew revenue faster — H at a 52.46% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.
Does H or LULU pay a bigger dividend?: H pays a dividend (0.34% yield), while LULU has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is H or LULU more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — H at 1.26% versus LULU at 13.03%.
How have H and LULU total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, H delivered 13.34% and LULU delivered 5.15% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full H analysis Full LULU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Hyatt Hotels P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Hyatt Hotels dividend yield Hyatt Hotels ROE Lululemon Athletica ROE Hyatt Hotels operating margin Lululemon Athletica operating margin Hyatt Hotels revenue growth Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Hyatt Hotels free cash flow Lululemon Athletica free cash flow

Hyatt Hotels & Lululemon Athletica appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 10, 2026.