W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) vs L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX)
A side-by-side comparison of W.W. Grainger, Inc. and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
$1,297.45IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 10, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
$289.72IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 10, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — GWW vs LHX
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yGWW +551.0% (+20.6%/yr)LHX +294.2% (+14.7%/yr)GWW compounded faster over this window
GWW LHX
GWW vs LHX: by the numbers
- •GWW is the larger company ($61.26B vs $53.95B market cap).
- •LHX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (29.26 vs 33.11 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •GWW converts more revenue to profit (9.92% vs 8.17% net margin).
- •GWW grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.00% vs 4.55% CAGR).
- •LHX pays the higher dividend yield (1.69% vs 0.73%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GWW | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.11 | 29.26 |
| Forward P/E | 28.05 | 27.21 |
| P/S ratio | 3.26 | 2.38 |
| P/B ratio | 6.38 | 2.74 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.18 | 17.11 |
| FCF yield | 2.46% | 5.15% |
Profitability
| Metric | GWW | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.40% | 25.48% |
| Operating margin | 14.57% | 10.04% |
| Net margin | 9.92% | 8.17% |
| ROE | 19.44% | 9.43% |
| ROIC | 27.73% | 5.14% |
Dividends
| Metric | GWW | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.73% | 1.69% |
| Payout ratio | 26.78% | 57.18% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GWW | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.00% | 4.55% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 22.25% | -1.68% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.51% | 2.00% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 25.22% | 6.58% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, GWW or LHX?
- LHX has the lower trailing P/E: GWW trades at 33.11 and LHX at 29.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, GWW or LHX?
- Over the past five years, GWW grew revenue faster — GWW at a 9.00% CAGR versus LHX at 4.55%.
- Does GWW or LHX pay a bigger dividend?
- GWW yields 0.73% and LHX yields 1.69% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is GWW or LHX more profitable?
- GWW runs the higher net margin — GWW at 9.92% versus LHX at 8.17%.
- How have GWW and LHX total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, GWW delivered 21.21% and LHX delivered 14.54% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
W.W. Grainger P/E ratioL3Harris Technologies P/E ratioW.W. Grainger dividend yieldL3Harris Technologies dividend yieldW.W. Grainger ROEL3Harris Technologies ROEW.W. Grainger operating marginL3Harris Technologies operating marginW.W. Grainger revenue growthL3Harris Technologies revenue growthW.W. Grainger free cash flowL3Harris Technologies free cash flow
W.W. Grainger & L3Harris Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 11, 2026.