Is GWW or LHX cheaper?

On trailing earnings, LHX is cheaper: GWW trades at a 36.36 P/E and LHX at 31.33.

Which has grown faster, GWW or LHX?

Over the past five years, GWW grew revenue faster — GWW at a 9.12% CAGR versus LHX at 4.38%.

Does GWW or LHX pay a bigger dividend?

GWW yields 0.74% and LHX yields 1.73% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GWW or LHX more profitable?

GWW runs the higher net margin — GWW at 9.70% versus LHX at 7.71%.

Which has been the better investment, GWW or LHX?

Over the past 10-year, GWW delivered the higher annualized total return — GWW at 21.88% versus LHX at 15.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) vs L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX)

GWW leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics, though LHX is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of W.W. Grainger, Inc. and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

$54.30B

$288.52Industrials

Total return — GWW vs LHX

growth of $100 · last 30y

GWW +3408.1%LHX +2263.9%GWW compounded faster

GWW LHX

GWW vs LHX: by the numbers

•GWW is the larger company ($63.91B vs $54.30B market cap).
•LHX trades at the lower earnings multiple (31.33 vs 36.36 P/E).
•GWW converts more revenue to profit (9.70% vs 7.71% net margin).
•GWW grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.12% vs 4.38% CAGR).
•LHX pays the higher dividend yield (1.73% vs 0.74%).

Which is better, GWW or LHX?

Metric tally: GWW 10 · LHX 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueLHX(lower P/E)

GrowthGWW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeLHX(higher dividend yield)

QualityGWW(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GWW	LHX
P/E ratio	36.36	31.33●
Forward P/E	29.66	21.11●
P/S ratio	3.49	2.42●
P/B ratio	16.32	2.76●
PEG ratio	1.63●	4.26
EV / EBITDA	23.06	18.93●
FCF yield	2.15%	4.77%●

Profitability

Metric	GWW	LHX
Gross margin	39.15%●	25.26%
Operating margin	14.23%●	9.93%
Net margin	9.70%●	7.71%
ROE	45.34%●	8.80%
ROIC	27.73%●	5.14%

Dividends

Metric	GWW	LHX
Dividend yield	0.74%	1.73%●
Payout ratio	28.08%	58.34%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GWW	LHX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.12%●	4.38%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	22.25%●	10.38%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.67%●	0.45%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	26.29%●	7.82%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GWW or LHX?: It depends on your goal. value: LHX (lower P/E); growth: GWW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LHX (higher dividend yield); quality: GWW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GWW leads 10 to 7.
Is GWW or LHX cheaper?: On trailing earnings, LHX is cheaper: GWW trades at a 36.36 P/E and LHX at 31.33.
Which has grown faster, GWW or LHX?: Over the past five years, GWW grew revenue faster — GWW at a 9.12% CAGR versus LHX at 4.38%.
Does GWW or LHX pay a bigger dividend?: GWW yields 0.74% and LHX yields 1.73% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GWW or LHX more profitable?: GWW runs the higher net margin — GWW at 9.70% versus LHX at 7.71%.
Which has been the better investment, GWW or LHX?: Over the past 10-year, GWW delivered the higher annualized total return — GWW at 21.88% versus LHX at 15.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GWW analysis Full LHX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

W.W. Grainger P/E ratio L3Harris Technologies P/E ratio W.W. Grainger dividend yield L3Harris Technologies dividend yield W.W. Grainger ROE L3Harris Technologies ROE W.W. Grainger operating margin L3Harris Technologies operating margin W.W. Grainger revenue growth L3Harris Technologies revenue growth W.W. Grainger free cash flow L3Harris Technologies free cash flow

W.W. Grainger & L3Harris Technologies appear in these rankings

Dividend Aristocrats Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.