Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) vs Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO)
A side-by-side comparison of Global Water Resources, Inc. and Pure Cycle Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
$8.14UtilitiesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:54 AM EDT
PCYO
Pure Cycle Corporation
$10.90UtilitiesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:49 AM EDT
Total return — GWRS vs PCYO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yGWRS +33.3% (+2.9%/yr)PCYO +89.5% (+6.6%/yr)PCYO compounded faster over this window
GWRS PCYO
GWRS vs PCYO: by the numbers
- •PCYO is the larger company ($263M vs $234M market cap).
- •PCYO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.86 vs 73.93 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •PCYO converts more revenue to profit (43.66% vs 5.22% net margin).
- •PCYO grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.63% vs 8.11% CAGR).
- •GWRS pays a dividend (3.79% yield), while PCYO has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GWRS | PCYO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 73.93 | 17.86 |
| Forward P/E | 84.21 | N/A |
| PEG ratio | 4.21 | 1.27 |
| P/S ratio | 3.89 | 7.78 |
| P/B ratio | 2.76 | 1.73 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.59 | 18.28 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 1.83% |
Profitability
| Metric | GWRS | PCYO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 44.86% | 57.76% |
| Operating margin | 13.60% | 29.40% |
| Net margin | 5.22% | 43.66% |
| ROE | 3.70% | 9.71% |
| ROIC | 1.29% | 6.43% |
Dividends
| Metric | GWRS | PCYO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.79% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 276.08% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GWRS | PCYO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.11% | 8.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.51% | 14.04% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -21.13% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -13.53% | -4.87% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, GWRS or PCYO?
- PCYO has the lower trailing P/E: GWRS trades at 73.93 and PCYO at 17.86. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, GWRS or PCYO?
- Over the past five years, PCYO grew revenue faster — GWRS at a 8.11% CAGR versus PCYO at 8.63%.
- Does GWRS or PCYO pay a bigger dividend?
- GWRS pays a dividend (3.79% yield), while PCYO has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is GWRS or PCYO more profitable?
- PCYO runs the higher net margin — GWRS at 5.22% versus PCYO at 43.66%.
- How have GWRS and PCYO total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, GWRS delivered 2.92% and PCYO delivered 6.49% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Global Water Resources P/E ratioPure Cycle P/E ratioGlobal Water Resources dividend yieldGlobal Water Resources ROEPure Cycle ROEGlobal Water Resources operating marginPure Cycle operating marginGlobal Water Resources revenue growthPure Cycle revenue growthGlobal Water Resources free cash flowPure Cycle free cash flow
Global Water Resources & Pure Cycle appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.