Which has the lower trailing P/E, GTX or RUSHA?

RUSHA has the lower trailing P/E: GTX trades at 14.35 and RUSHA at 14.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GTX or RUSHA?

Over the past five years, RUSHA grew revenue faster — GTX at a 0.05% CAGR versus RUSHA at 7.70%.

Does GTX or RUSHA pay a bigger dividend?

GTX yields 1.20% and RUSHA yields 1.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GTX or RUSHA more profitable?

GTX runs the higher net margin — GTX at 9.51% versus RUSHA at 3.67%.

How have GTX and RUSHA total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, GTX delivered 29.98% and RUSHA delivered 19.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) vs Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA)

A side-by-side comparison of Garrett Motion Inc. and Rush Enterprises, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

GTX

Garrett Motion Inc.

$4.90B

$26.26Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:00 PM EDT

RUSHA

Rush Enterprises, Inc.

$5.49B

$47.11Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:55 PM EDT

Total return — GTX vs RUSHA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

GTX +43.5% (+4.6%/yr)RUSHA +339.0% (+20.3%/yr)RUSHA compounded faster over this window

GTX RUSHA

GTX vs RUSHA: by the numbers

•RUSHA is the larger company ($5.49B vs $4.90B market cap).
•RUSHA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.19 vs 14.35 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•GTX converts more revenue to profit (9.51% vs 3.67% net margin).
•RUSHA grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.70% vs 0.05% CAGR).
•GTX pays the higher dividend yield (1.20% vs 1.10%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GTX	RUSHA
P/E ratio	14.35	14.19
Forward P/E	13.25	19.11
PEG ratio	1.87	1.37
P/S ratio	1.30	0.76
P/B ratio	N/A	2.36
EV / EBITDA	12.26	12.49
FCF yield	7.45%	2.28%

Profitability

Metric	GTX	RUSHA
Gross margin	19.47%	18.98%
Operating margin	10.63%	5.13%
Net margin	9.51%	3.67%
ROE	N/A	11.38%
ROIC	31.32%	7.17%

Dividends

Metric	GTX	RUSHA
Dividend yield	1.20%	1.10%
Payout ratio	17.49%	15.66%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GTX	RUSHA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.05%	7.70%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	7.90%	19.21%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-22.34%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	29.98%	19.56%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GTX or RUSHA?: RUSHA has the lower trailing P/E: GTX trades at 14.35 and RUSHA at 14.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GTX or RUSHA?: Over the past five years, RUSHA grew revenue faster — GTX at a 0.05% CAGR versus RUSHA at 7.70%.
Does GTX or RUSHA pay a bigger dividend?: GTX yields 1.20% and RUSHA yields 1.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GTX or RUSHA more profitable?: GTX runs the higher net margin — GTX at 9.51% versus RUSHA at 3.67%.
How have GTX and RUSHA total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, GTX delivered 29.98% and RUSHA delivered 19.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GTX analysis Full RUSHA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Garrett Motion P/E ratio Rush Enterprises P/E ratio Garrett Motion dividend yield Rush Enterprises dividend yield Garrett Motion ROE Rush Enterprises ROE Garrett Motion operating margin Rush Enterprises operating margin Garrett Motion revenue growth Rush Enterprises revenue growth Garrett Motion free cash flow Rush Enterprises free cash flow

Garrett Motion & Rush Enterprises appear in these rankings

Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.