Which has the lower trailing P/E, GTX or MTN?

GTX has the lower trailing P/E: GTX trades at 14.34 and MTN at 35.61. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GTX or MTN?

Over the past five years, MTN grew revenue faster — GTX at a 0.05% CAGR versus MTN at 8.25%.

Does GTX or MTN pay a bigger dividend?

GTX yields 1.20% and MTN yields 6.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GTX or MTN more profitable?

GTX runs the higher net margin — GTX at 9.51% versus MTN at 5.20%.

How have GTX and MTN total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, GTX delivered 29.98% and MTN delivered -12.89% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) vs Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN)

A side-by-side comparison of Garrett Motion Inc. and Vail Resorts, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

GTX

Garrett Motion Inc.

$4.89B

$26.23Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:30 PM EDT

MTN

Vail Resorts, Inc.

$5.23B

$146.71Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:25 PM EDT

Total return — GTX vs MTN

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

GTX +43.5% (+4.6%/yr)MTN -37.2% (-5.6%/yr)GTX compounded faster over this window

GTX MTN

GTX vs MTN: by the numbers

•MTN is the larger company ($5.23B vs $4.89B market cap).
•GTX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.34 vs 35.61 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•GTX converts more revenue to profit (9.51% vs 5.20% net margin).
•MTN grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.25% vs 0.05% CAGR).
•MTN pays the higher dividend yield (6.37% vs 1.20%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GTX	MTN
P/E ratio	14.34	35.61
Forward P/E	13.24	26.35
PEG ratio	1.87	6.30
P/S ratio	1.30	1.84
P/B ratio	N/A	21.73
EV / EBITDA	12.25	11.59
FCF yield	7.46%	5.97%

Profitability

Metric	GTX	MTN
Gross margin	19.47%	41.75%
Operating margin	10.63%	14.82%
Net margin	9.51%	5.20%
ROE	N/A	61.34%
ROIC	31.32%	7.01%

Dividends

Metric	GTX	MTN
Dividend yield	1.20%	6.37%
Payout ratio	17.49%	215.53%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GTX	MTN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.05%	8.25%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	7.90%	5.43%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-5.32%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	29.98%	-12.89%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GTX or MTN?: GTX has the lower trailing P/E: GTX trades at 14.34 and MTN at 35.61. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GTX or MTN?: Over the past five years, MTN grew revenue faster — GTX at a 0.05% CAGR versus MTN at 8.25%.
Does GTX or MTN pay a bigger dividend?: GTX yields 1.20% and MTN yields 6.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GTX or MTN more profitable?: GTX runs the higher net margin — GTX at 9.51% versus MTN at 5.20%.
How have GTX and MTN total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, GTX delivered 29.98% and MTN delivered -12.89% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GTX analysis Full MTN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Garrett Motion P/E ratio Vail Resorts P/E ratio Garrett Motion dividend yield Vail Resorts dividend yield Garrett Motion ROE Vail Resorts ROE Garrett Motion operating margin Vail Resorts operating margin Garrett Motion revenue growth Vail Resorts revenue growth Garrett Motion free cash flow Vail Resorts free cash flow

Garrett Motion & Vail Resorts appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.