Which has the lower trailing P/E, GTX or MAT?

MAT has the lower trailing P/E: GTX trades at 14.33 and MAT at 11.76. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GTX or MAT?

Over the past five years, MAT grew revenue faster — GTX at a 0.05% CAGR versus MAT at 1.24%.

Does GTX or MAT pay a bigger dividend?

GTX pays a dividend (1.20% yield), while MAT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is GTX or MAT more profitable?

GTX runs the higher net margin — GTX at 9.51% versus MAT at 7.78%.

How have GTX and MAT total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, GTX delivered 29.98% and MAT delivered -2.83% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) vs Mattel, Inc. (MAT)

A side-by-side comparison of Garrett Motion Inc. and Mattel, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

GTX

Garrett Motion Inc.

$4.89B

$26.22Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:40 AM EDT

MAT

Mattel, Inc.

$4.58B

$15.76Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:40 AM EDT

Total return — GTX vs MAT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

GTX +43.5% (+4.6%/yr)MAT -0.1% (-0.0%/yr)GTX compounded faster over this window

GTX MAT

GTX vs MAT: by the numbers

•GTX is the larger company ($4.89B vs $4.58B market cap).
•MAT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.76 vs 14.33 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•GTX converts more revenue to profit (9.51% vs 7.78% net margin).
•MAT grew revenue faster over the past five years (1.24% vs 0.05% CAGR).
•GTX pays a dividend (1.20% yield), while MAT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GTX	MAT
P/E ratio	14.33	11.76
Forward P/E	13.23	12.08
PEG ratio	1.87	0.41
P/S ratio	1.30	0.83
P/B ratio	N/A	2.29
EV / EBITDA	12.25	N/A
FCF yield	7.47%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	GTX	MAT
Gross margin	19.47%	47.41%
Operating margin	10.63%	8.50%
Net margin	9.51%	7.78%
ROE	N/A	21.39%
ROIC	31.32%	7.88%

Dividends

Metric	GTX	MAT
Dividend yield	1.20%	N/A
Payout ratio	17.49%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GTX	MAT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.05%	1.24%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	7.90%	28.27%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	29.98%	-2.83%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GTX or MAT?: MAT has the lower trailing P/E: GTX trades at 14.33 and MAT at 11.76. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GTX or MAT?: Over the past five years, MAT grew revenue faster — GTX at a 0.05% CAGR versus MAT at 1.24%.
Does GTX or MAT pay a bigger dividend?: GTX pays a dividend (1.20% yield), while MAT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is GTX or MAT more profitable?: GTX runs the higher net margin — GTX at 9.51% versus MAT at 7.78%.
How have GTX and MAT total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, GTX delivered 29.98% and MAT delivered -2.83% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GTX analysis Full MAT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Garrett Motion P/E ratio Mattel P/E ratio Garrett Motion dividend yield Garrett Motion ROE Mattel ROE Garrett Motion operating margin Mattel operating margin Garrett Motion revenue growth Mattel revenue growth Garrett Motion free cash flow Mattel free cash flow

Garrett Motion & Mattel appear in these rankings

Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.