Which has the lower trailing P/E, GTM or KMX?

GTM has the lower trailing P/E: GTM trades at 8.36 and KMX at 36.57. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GTM or KMX?

Over the past five years, GTM grew revenue faster — GTM at a 18.92% CAGR versus KMX at 2.39%.

Is GTM or KMX more profitable?

GTM runs the higher net margin — GTM at 10.10% versus KMX at 0.84%.

How have GTM and KMX total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, GTM delivered -42.92% and KMX delivered 0.09% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) vs CarMax, Inc. (KMX)

A side-by-side comparison of ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. and CarMax, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: GTM is classified in Technology; KMX is classified in Consumer Cyclical. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

GTM

ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.

$967M

$3.28TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

KMX

CarMax, Inc.

$8.36B

$58.88Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — GTM vs KMX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

GTM -90.4%KMX -30.9%KMX compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

GTM KMX

GTM vs KMX: by the numbers

•KMX is the larger company ($8.36B vs $967M market cap).
•GTM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.36 vs 36.57 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•GTM converts more revenue to profit (10.10% vs 0.84% net margin).
•GTM grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.92% vs 2.39% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GTM	KMX
P/E ratio	8.36	36.57
Forward P/E	2.97	21.86
P/S ratio	0.83	0.32
P/B ratio	0.71	1.37
PEG ratio	0.07	N/A
EV / EBITDA	7.57	N/A
FCF yield	36.10%	11.88%

Profitability

Metric	GTM	KMX
Gross margin	84.21%	10.24%
Operating margin	19.40%	-1.85%
Net margin	10.10%	0.84%
ROE	8.60%	3.64%
ROIC	2.48%	-1.10%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GTM	KMX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.92%	2.39%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-18.18%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	11.57%	13.85%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-42.92%	-15.08%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GTM or KMX?: GTM has the lower trailing P/E: GTM trades at 8.36 and KMX at 36.57. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GTM or KMX?: Over the past five years, GTM grew revenue faster — GTM at a 18.92% CAGR versus KMX at 2.39%.
Is GTM or KMX more profitable?: GTM runs the higher net margin — GTM at 10.10% versus KMX at 0.84%.
How have GTM and KMX total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, GTM delivered -42.92% and KMX delivered 0.09% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GTM analysis Full KMX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

ZoomInfo Technologies P/E ratio CarMax P/E ratio ZoomInfo Technologies dividend yield CarMax dividend yield ZoomInfo Technologies ROE CarMax ROE ZoomInfo Technologies operating margin CarMax operating margin ZoomInfo Technologies revenue growth CarMax revenue growth ZoomInfo Technologies free cash flow CarMax free cash flow

ZoomInfo Technologies & CarMax appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.