Which has the lower trailing P/E, GTEC or PSHG?

GTEC has the lower trailing P/E: GTEC trades at 1.30 and PSHG at 1.93. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GTEC or PSHG?

Over the past five years, PSHG grew revenue faster — GTEC at a 1.96% CAGR versus PSHG at 30.39%.

Is GTEC or PSHG more profitable?

PSHG runs the higher net margin — GTEC at 12.32% versus PSHG at 29.70%.

How have GTEC and PSHG total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, GTEC delivered -33.89% and PSHG delivered -51.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation (GTEC) vs Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG)

A side-by-side comparison of Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation and Performance Shipping Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

GTEC

Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation

$21M

$0.78IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:31 AM EDT

PSHG

Performance Shipping Inc.

$21M

$1.71IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:22 AM EDT

Total return — GTEC vs PSHG

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

GTEC -91.8% (-26.8%/yr)PSHG -99.1% (-44.4%/yr)GTEC compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

GTEC PSHG

GTEC vs PSHG: by the numbers

•PSHG is the larger company ($21M vs $21M market cap).
•GTEC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (1.30 vs 1.93 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PSHG converts more revenue to profit (29.70% vs 12.32% net margin).
•PSHG grew revenue faster over the past five years (30.39% vs 1.96% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GTEC	PSHG
P/E ratio	1.30	1.93
Forward P/E	1.32	1.36
P/S ratio	0.20	0.19
P/B ratio	0.23	0.06
EV / EBITDA	N/A	3.33
FCF yield	71.52%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	GTEC	PSHG
Gross margin	32.89%	50.26%
Operating margin	8.29%	41.86%
Net margin	12.32%	29.70%
ROE	14.26%	9.79%
ROIC	13.08%	7.02%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GTEC	PSHG
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	1.96%	30.39%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-14.29%	-24.62%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-33.89%	-51.94%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GTEC or PSHG?: GTEC has the lower trailing P/E: GTEC trades at 1.30 and PSHG at 1.93. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GTEC or PSHG?: Over the past five years, PSHG grew revenue faster — GTEC at a 1.96% CAGR versus PSHG at 30.39%.
Is GTEC or PSHG more profitable?: PSHG runs the higher net margin — GTEC at 12.32% versus PSHG at 29.70%.
How have GTEC and PSHG total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, GTEC delivered -33.89% and PSHG delivered -51.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GTEC analysis Full PSHG analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Greenland Technologies P/E ratio Performance Shipping P/E ratio Greenland Technologies ROE Performance Shipping ROE Greenland Technologies operating margin Performance Shipping operating margin Greenland Technologies revenue growth Performance Shipping revenue growth Greenland Technologies free cash flow Performance Shipping free cash flow

Greenland Technologies & Performance Shipping appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.