The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) vs Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT)

A side-by-side comparison of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Liquidity Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — GT vs LQDT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
GT -84.1% (-16.8%/yr)LQDT +330.0% (+15.7%/yr)LQDT compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001kStart $10020182020202220242026$16$430
GT LQDT

GT vs LQDT: by the numbers

  • •GT is the larger company ($1.37B vs $1.34B market cap).
  • •LQDT is profitable (6.79% net margin) while GT runs a net loss (-14.37%).
  • •LQDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.03% vs 3.90% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricGTLQDT
P/E ratioN/A42.21
Forward P/EN/A23.40
P/S ratio0.082.74
P/B ratio0.485.69
EV / EBITDA6.1820.79
FCF yield14.02%6.70%

Profitability

MetricGTLQDT
Gross margin18.34%46.56%
Operating margin2.14%9.00%
Net margin-14.37%6.79%
ROE-89.57%14.10%
ROIC3.04%11.85%

Growth (annualized)

MetricGTLQDT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)3.90%15.03%
FCF CAGR (5Y)-30.63%9.39%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-24.58%14.55%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, GT or LQDT?
Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — GT at a 3.90% CAGR versus LQDT at 15.03%.
Is GT or LQDT more profitable?
LQDT runs the higher net margin — GT at -14.37% versus LQDT at 6.79%.
How have GT and LQDT total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, GT delivered -16.92% and LQDT delivered 15.27% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.