Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) vs Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM)
A side-by-side comparison of Ferroglobe PLC and Latham Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
$4.39Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:34 PM EDT
SWIM
Latham Group, Inc.
$6.43Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:35 PM EDT
Total return — GSM vs SWIM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5yGSM +35.2% (+6.2%/yr)SWIM -76.6% (-25.2%/yr)GSM compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
GSM SWIM
GSM vs SWIM: by the numbers
- •GSM is the larger company ($826M vs $755M market cap).
- •SWIM is profitable (0.92% net margin) while GSM runs a net loss (-2.96%).
- •SWIM grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.72% vs 0.06% CAGR).
- •GSM pays a dividend (1.35% yield), while SWIM has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GSM | SWIM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | N/A | 137.94 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 35.97 |
| P/S ratio | 0.60 | 1.31 |
| P/B ratio | 1.15 | 1.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | N/A | 12.43 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 4.91% |
Profitability
| Metric | GSM | SWIM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 6.70% | 33.38% |
| Operating margin | -9.00% | 5.08% |
| Net margin | -2.96% | 0.92% |
| ROE | -5.63% | 1.29% |
| ROIC | -11.22% | 2.14% |
Dividends
| Metric | GSM | SWIM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.35% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GSM | SWIM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.06% | 2.72% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -5.96% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -3.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -12.07% | -14.94% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, GSM or SWIM?
- Over the past five years, SWIM grew revenue faster — GSM at a 0.06% CAGR versus SWIM at 2.72%.
- Does GSM or SWIM pay a bigger dividend?
- GSM pays a dividend (1.35% yield), while SWIM has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is GSM or SWIM more profitable?
- SWIM runs the higher net margin — GSM at -2.96% versus SWIM at 0.92%.
- How have GSM and SWIM total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, GSM delivered -12.07% and SWIM delivered -14.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Latham P/E ratioFerroglobe dividend yieldFerroglobe ROELatham ROEFerroglobe operating marginLatham operating marginFerroglobe revenue growthLatham revenue growthFerroglobe free cash flowLatham free cash flow
Ferroglobe & Latham appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.