Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) vs Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (SCZM)

A side-by-side comparison of Ferroglobe PLC and Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — GSM vs SCZM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1y
GSM -5.7% (-5.7%/yr)SCZM -5.6% (-5.6%/yr)SCZM compounded faster over this window
100150Start $1002026$94$94
GSM SCZM

GSM vs SCZM: by the numbers

  • •SCZM is the larger company ($831M vs $817M market cap).
  • •SCZM is profitable (9.95% net margin) while GSM runs a net loss (-2.96%).
  • •SCZM grew revenue faster over the past five years (56.85% vs 0.06% CAGR).
  • •GSM pays a dividend (1.35% yield), while SCZM has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricGSMSCZM
P/E ratioN/A20.34
Forward P/EN/A8.74
P/S ratio0.601.97
P/B ratio1.143.90
EV / EBITDAN/A5.35
FCF yieldN/A3.49%

Profitability

MetricGSMSCZM
Gross margin6.70%35.90%
Operating margin-9.00%29.81%
Net margin-2.96%9.95%
ROE-5.63%19.72%
ROIC-11.22%18.96%

Dividends

MetricGSMSCZM
Dividend yield1.35%N/A

Growth (annualized)

MetricGSMSCZM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)0.06%56.85%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-12.07%N/A

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, GSM or SCZM?
Over the past five years, SCZM grew revenue faster — GSM at a 0.06% CAGR versus SCZM at 56.85%.
Does GSM or SCZM pay a bigger dividend?
GSM pays a dividend (1.35% yield), while SCZM has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is GSM or SCZM more profitable?
SCZM runs the higher net margin — GSM at -2.96% versus SCZM at 9.95%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.