Which has grown faster, GSM or NWPX?

Over the past five years, NWPX grew revenue faster — GSM at a 0.06% CAGR versus NWPX at 14.40%.

Does GSM or NWPX pay a bigger dividend?

GSM pays a dividend (1.35% yield), while NWPX has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is GSM or NWPX more profitable?

NWPX runs the higher net margin — GSM at -2.96% versus NWPX at 8.49%.

How have GSM and NWPX total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, GSM delivered -6.06% and NWPX delivered 24.24% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) vs NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. (NWPX)

A side-by-side comparison of Ferroglobe PLC and NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

GSM

Ferroglobe PLC

$828M

$4.39Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:55 PM EDT

NWPX

NWPX Infrastructure, Inc.

$1.01B

$105.14Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:54 PM EDT

Total return — GSM vs NWPX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

GSM -47.4% (-6.2%/yr)NWPX +784.4% (+24.4%/yr)NWPX compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

GSM NWPX

GSM vs NWPX: by the numbers

•NWPX is the larger company ($1.01B vs $828M market cap).
•NWPX is profitable (8.49% net margin) while GSM runs a net loss (-2.96%).
•NWPX grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.40% vs 0.06% CAGR).
•GSM pays a dividend (1.35% yield), while NWPX has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GSM	NWPX
P/E ratio	N/A	21.07
Forward P/E	N/A	19.38
PEG ratio	N/A	1.62
P/S ratio	0.61	1.76
P/B ratio	1.15	2.42
EV / EBITDA	N/A	12.67
FCF yield	N/A	7.86%

Profitability

Metric	GSM	NWPX
Gross margin	6.70%	20.88%
Operating margin	-9.00%	11.47%
Net margin	-2.96%	8.49%
ROE	-5.63%	11.65%
ROIC	-11.22%	9.47%

Dividends

Metric	GSM	NWPX
Dividend yield	1.35%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GSM	NWPX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.06%	14.40%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	13.17%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	32.18%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-12.07%	33.95%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, GSM or NWPX?: Over the past five years, NWPX grew revenue faster — GSM at a 0.06% CAGR versus NWPX at 14.40%.
Does GSM or NWPX pay a bigger dividend?: GSM pays a dividend (1.35% yield), while NWPX has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is GSM or NWPX more profitable?: NWPX runs the higher net margin — GSM at -2.96% versus NWPX at 8.49%.
How have GSM and NWPX total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, GSM delivered -6.06% and NWPX delivered 24.24% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GSM analysis Full NWPX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

NWPX Infrastructure P/E ratio Ferroglobe dividend yield Ferroglobe ROE NWPX Infrastructure ROE Ferroglobe operating margin NWPX Infrastructure operating margin Ferroglobe revenue growth NWPX Infrastructure revenue growth Ferroglobe free cash flow NWPX Infrastructure free cash flow

Ferroglobe & NWPX Infrastructure appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.