Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) vs Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB)
A side-by-side comparison of Ferroglobe PLC and Limbach Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
$4.38Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:40 AM EDT
LMB
Limbach Holdings, Inc.
$51.11Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:40 AM EDT
Total return — GSM vs LMB
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yGSM -48.2% (-6.4%/yr)LMB +320.0% (+15.4%/yr)LMB compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
GSM LMB
GSM vs LMB: by the numbers
- •GSM is the larger company ($826M vs $609M market cap).
- •LMB is profitable (4.42% net margin) while GSM runs a net loss (-2.96%).
- •LMB grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.28% vs 0.06% CAGR).
- •GSM pays a dividend (1.35% yield), while LMB has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GSM | LMB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | N/A | 20.44 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 12.81 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 0.50 |
| P/S ratio | 0.60 | 0.89 |
| P/B ratio | 1.15 | 3.00 |
| EV / EBITDA | N/A | 11.28 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 8.31% |
Profitability
| Metric | GSM | LMB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 6.70% | 23.58% |
| Operating margin | -9.00% | 5.72% |
| Net margin | -2.96% | 4.42% |
| ROE | -5.63% | 14.87% |
| ROIC | -11.22% | 12.30% |
Dividends
| Metric | GSM | LMB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.35% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GSM | LMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.06% | 5.28% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 41.39% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -12.07% | 49.10% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, GSM or LMB?
- Over the past five years, LMB grew revenue faster — GSM at a 0.06% CAGR versus LMB at 5.28%.
- Does GSM or LMB pay a bigger dividend?
- GSM pays a dividend (1.35% yield), while LMB has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is GSM or LMB more profitable?
- LMB runs the higher net margin — GSM at -2.96% versus LMB at 4.42%.
- How have GSM and LMB total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, GSM delivered -6.06% and LMB delivered 15.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Limbach P/E ratioFerroglobe dividend yieldFerroglobe ROELimbach ROEFerroglobe operating marginLimbach operating marginFerroglobe revenue growthLimbach revenue growthFerroglobe free cash flowLimbach free cash flow
Ferroglobe & Limbach appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.