Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) vs Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC)

A side-by-side comparison of Ferroglobe PLC and Lithium Americas Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — GSM vs LAC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
GSM -47.4% (-6.2%/yr)LAC +16.4% (+1.5%/yr)LAC compounded faster over this window
02004006008001kStart $10020182020202220242026$53$116
GSM LAC

GSM vs LAC: by the numbers

  • •GSM is the larger company ($826M vs $570M market cap).
  • •Both run net losses; LAC's is the smaller (0.00% vs -2.96% net margin).
  • •GSM pays a dividend (1.35% yield), while LAC has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricGSMLAC
P/S ratio0.60N/A
P/B ratio1.150.40

Profitability

MetricGSMLAC
Gross margin6.70%0.00%
Operating margin-9.00%0.00%
Net margin-2.96%0.00%
ROE-5.63%-6.86%
ROIC-11.22%-1.95%

Dividends

MetricGSMLAC
Dividend yield1.35%N/A

Growth (annualized)

MetricGSMLAC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)0.06%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)-12.07%-27.85%

Frequently asked

Does GSM or LAC pay a bigger dividend?
GSM pays a dividend (1.35% yield), while LAC has no payments in the available dividend history.
How have GSM and LAC total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, GSM delivered -6.06% and LAC delivered 1.77% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.