Goosehead Insurance, Inc (GSHD) vs Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP)
A side-by-side comparison of Goosehead Insurance, Inc and Perella Weinberg Partners across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
GSHD
Goosehead Insurance, Inc
$44.62Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:25 PM EDT
PWP
Perella Weinberg Partners
$15.94Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:25 PM EDT
Total return — GSHD vs PWP
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6yGSHD -60.3% (-14.3%/yr)PWP +79.0% (+10.2%/yr)PWP compounded faster over this window
GSHD PWP
GSHD vs PWP: by the numbers
- •GSHD is the larger company ($1.67B vs $1.57B market cap).
- •GSHD trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (32.57 vs 53.06 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •GSHD converts more revenue to profit (8.78% vs 3.22% net margin).
- •GSHD grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.21% vs 7.67% CAGR).
- •PWP pays a dividend (1.76% yield), while GSHD is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GSHD | PWP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.57 | 53.06 |
| Forward P/E | 20.88 | 17.33 |
| PEG ratio | 2.13 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 4.15 | 2.27 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.32 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 4.94% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | GSHD | PWP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 46.25% | 97.23% |
| Operating margin | 25.83% | 2.84% |
| Net margin | 8.78% | 3.22% |
| ROIC | 24.29% | N/A |
Dividends
| Metric | GSHD | PWP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 1.76% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 93.21% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GSHD | PWP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 24.21% | 7.67% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.08% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.59% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -21.11% | 5.32% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, GSHD or PWP?
- GSHD has the lower trailing P/E: GSHD trades at 32.57 and PWP at 53.06. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, GSHD or PWP?
- Over the past five years, GSHD grew revenue faster — GSHD at a 24.21% CAGR versus PWP at 7.67%.
- Does GSHD or PWP pay a bigger dividend?
- PWP pays a dividend (1.76% yield), while GSHD is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is GSHD or PWP more profitable?
- GSHD runs the higher net margin — GSHD at 8.78% versus PWP at 3.22%.
- How have GSHD and PWP total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, GSHD delivered -21.11% and PWP delivered 5.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Goosehead Insurance P/E ratioPerella Weinberg Partners P/E ratioPerella Weinberg Partners dividend yieldGoosehead Insurance ROEPerella Weinberg Partners ROEGoosehead Insurance operating marginPerella Weinberg Partners operating marginGoosehead Insurance revenue growthPerella Weinberg Partners revenue growthGoosehead Insurance free cash flow
Goosehead Insurance & Perella Weinberg Partners appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.