Goosehead Insurance, Inc (GSHD) vs Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAC)
Over the past 5 years, GSHD lagged NAC — -21.11% vs -2.89% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of Goosehead Insurance, Inc and Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — GSHD vs NAC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8yMetrics side by side
Did GSHD beat NAC?
Over the past 5 years, GSHD lagged NAC — -21.11% vs -2.89% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | GSHD | NAC |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | -35.89% | -6.80% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | -11.54% | 8.87% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -21.11% | -2.89% |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | N/A | 0.56% |
NAC is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has GSHD beaten NAC?
- Over the past 5 years, GSHD lagged NAC — -21.11% vs -2.89% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.