Is GS or QCOM cheaper?

On trailing earnings, GS is cheaper: GS trades at a 19.41 P/E and QCOM at 22.72.

Which has grown faster, GS or QCOM?

Over the past five years, GS grew revenue faster — GS at a 12.83% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.

Does GS or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?

GS yields 1.60% and QCOM yields 1.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GS or QCOM more profitable?

QCOM runs the higher net margin — GS at 16.31% versus QCOM at 22.31%.

Which has been the better investment, GS or QCOM?

Over the past 10-year, GS delivered the higher annualized total return — GS at 24.15% versus QCOM at 17.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)

GS leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

$313.52B

$1062.75Financial Services

QCOM

QUALCOMM Incorporated

$223.15B

$211.72Technology

Total return — GS vs QCOM

growth of $100 · last 27y

GS +1410.0%QCOM +1513.7%QCOM compounded faster

GS QCOM

GS vs QCOM: by the numbers

•GS is the larger company ($313.52B vs $223.15B market cap).
•GS trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.41 vs 22.72 P/E).
•QCOM converts more revenue to profit (22.31% vs 16.31% net margin).
•GS grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.83% vs 8.63% CAGR).
•QCOM pays the higher dividend yield (1.70% vs 1.60%).

Which is better, GS or QCOM?

Metric tally: GS 8 · QCOM 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueGS(lower P/E)

GrowthGS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeQCOM(higher dividend yield)

QualityQCOM(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GS	QCOM
P/E ratio	19.41●	22.72
Forward P/E	17.89●	19.72
P/S ratio	2.95●	5.10
P/B ratio	2.67●	8.32
PEG ratio	0.61●	3.96
EV / EBITDA	—	16.71
FCF yield	—	5.51%

Profitability

Metric	GS	QCOM
Gross margin	55.55%	54.80%
Operating margin	20.48%	25.52%●
Net margin	16.31%	22.31%●
ROE	14.72%	36.38%●
ROIC	1.92%	13.15%●

Dividends

Metric	GS	QCOM
Dividend yield	1.60%	1.70%●
Payout ratio	32.72%	70.95%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GS	QCOM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.83%●	8.63%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.75%●	5.74%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	—	9.39%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	25.96%●	11.87%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GS or QCOM?: It depends on your goal. value: GS (lower P/E); growth: GS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: QCOM (higher dividend yield); quality: QCOM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GS leads 8 to 5.
Is GS or QCOM cheaper?: On trailing earnings, GS is cheaper: GS trades at a 19.41 P/E and QCOM at 22.72.
Which has grown faster, GS or QCOM?: Over the past five years, GS grew revenue faster — GS at a 12.83% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
Does GS or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?: GS yields 1.60% and QCOM yields 1.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GS or QCOM more profitable?: QCOM runs the higher net margin — GS at 16.31% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
Which has been the better investment, GS or QCOM?: Over the past 10-year, GS delivered the higher annualized total return — GS at 24.15% versus QCOM at 17.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GS analysis Full QCOM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Goldman Sachs P/E ratio QUALCOMM P/E ratio Goldman Sachs dividend yield QUALCOMM dividend yield Goldman Sachs ROE QUALCOMM ROE Goldman Sachs operating margin QUALCOMM operating margin Goldman Sachs revenue growth QUALCOMM revenue growth Goldman Sachs free cash flow QUALCOMM free cash flow

Goldman Sachs & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Largest Companies by Market Cap

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.