The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) vs Morgan Stanley (MS)

A side-by-side comparison of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Morgan Stanley across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnGS vs MS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 27y
GS +2019.5%MS +739.4%GS compounded faster
05001k2k2k3kStart $10020042009201420192024$2,120$839
GS MS

GS vs MS: by the numbers

  • MS is the larger company ($333.74B vs $304.84B market cap).
  • GS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.18 vs 17.47 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • GS converts more revenue to profit (17.78% vs 15.99% net margin).
  • MS grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.41% vs 13.76% CAGR).
  • MS pays the higher dividend yield (1.86% vs 1.62%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricGSMS
P/E ratio16.1817.47
Forward P/E15.1116.68
P/S ratio2.712.70
P/B ratio2.602.99
PEG ratio0.650.60

Profitability

MetricGSMS
Gross margin47.48%59.72%
Operating margin24.81%20.70%
Net margin17.78%15.99%
ROE17.05%17.70%
ROIC1.92%1.69%

Dividends

MetricGSMS
Dividend yield1.62%1.86%
Payout ratio32.72%38.68%

Growth (annualized)

MetricGSMS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)13.76%18.41%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.75%9.56%
Total return CAGR (5Y)25.27%20.87%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GS or MS?
GS has the lower trailing P/E: GS trades at 16.18 and MS at 17.47. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GS or MS?
Over the past five years, MS grew revenue faster — GS at a 13.76% CAGR versus MS at 18.41%.
Does GS or MS pay a bigger dividend?
GS yields 1.62% and MS yields 1.86% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GS or MS more profitable?
GS runs the higher net margin — GS at 17.78% versus MS at 15.99%.
How have GS and MS total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, GS delivered 22.84% and MS delivered 25.41% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.