Garmin Ltd. (GRMN) vs Teradyne, Inc. (TER)
GRMN leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Garmin Ltd. and Teradyne, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
GRMN
Garmin Ltd.
$250.90TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 16, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
$322.30TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — GRMN vs TER
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 26yGRMN +4677.1%TER +905.2%GRMN compounded faster
GRMN TER
GRMN vs TER: by the numbers
- •TER is the larger company ($50.45B vs $48.39B market cap).
- •GRMN trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.95 vs 63.36 P/E).
- •GRMN converts more revenue to profit (23.26% vs 22.55% net margin).
- •GRMN grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.13% vs 3.76% CAGR).
- •GRMN pays the higher dividend yield (1.55% vs 0.15%).
Which is better, GRMN or TER?
Metric tally: GRMN 12 · TER 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueGRMN(lower P/E)
GrowthGRMN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeGRMN(higher dividend yield)
QualityTER(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GRMN | TER |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.95● | 63.36 |
| Forward P/E | 25.07● | 45.88 |
| P/S ratio | 6.27● | 14.24 |
| P/B ratio | 5.05● | 17.15 |
| PEG ratio | 1.34● | 23.64 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.62● | 48.08 |
| FCF yield | 3.10%● | 1.03% |
Profitability
| Metric | GRMN | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 59.14% | 58.79% |
| Operating margin | 26.46% | 26.92% |
| Net margin | 23.26%● | 22.55% |
| ROE | 18.73% | 27.17%● |
| ROIC | 16.71% | 18.45%● |
Dividends
| Metric | GRMN | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.55%● | 0.15% |
| Payout ratio | 43.35% | 14.33% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GRMN | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.13%● | 3.76% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 9.55%● | -5.86% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 5.80%● | -3.97% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 13.09% | 22.41%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, GRMN or TER?
- It depends on your goal. value: GRMN (lower P/E); growth: GRMN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: GRMN (higher dividend yield); quality: TER (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GRMN leads 12 to 3.
- Is GRMN or TER cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, GRMN is cheaper: GRMN trades at a 26.95 P/E and TER at 63.36.
- Which has grown faster, GRMN or TER?
- Over the past five years, GRMN grew revenue faster — GRMN at a 11.13% CAGR versus TER at 3.76%.
- Does GRMN or TER pay a bigger dividend?
- GRMN yields 1.55% and TER yields 0.15% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is GRMN or TER more profitable?
- GRMN runs the higher net margin — GRMN at 23.26% versus TER at 22.55%.
- Which has been the better investment, GRMN or TER?
- Over the past 10-year, TER delivered the higher annualized total return — GRMN at 21.73% versus TER at 32.30%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Garmin P/E ratioTeradyne P/E ratioGarmin dividend yieldTeradyne dividend yieldGarmin ROETeradyne ROEGarmin operating marginTeradyne operating marginGarmin revenue growthTeradyne revenue growthGarmin free cash flowTeradyne free cash flow
Garmin & Teradyne appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 16, 2026.