Which has the lower trailing P/E, GRAB or SANM?

GRAB has the lower trailing P/E: GRAB trades at 22.24 and SANM at 40.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GRAB or SANM?

Over the past five years, GRAB grew revenue faster — GRAB at a 36.55% CAGR versus SANM at 12.21%.

Is GRAB or SANM more profitable?

GRAB runs the higher net margin — GRAB at 15.97% versus SANM at 2.41%.

How have GRAB and SANM total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, GRAB delivered -21.27% and SANM delivered 41.47% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) vs Sanmina Corporation (SANM)

A side-by-side comparison of Grab Holdings Limited and Sanmina Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

GRAB

Grab Holdings Limited

$12.24B

$3.08TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SANM

Sanmina Corporation

$12.28B

$229.04TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — GRAB vs SANM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

GRAB -73.8% (-20.0%/yr)SANM +581.5% (+37.7%/yr)SANM compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

GRAB SANM

GRAB vs SANM: by the numbers

•SANM is the larger company ($12.28B vs $12.24B market cap).
•GRAB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (22.24 vs 40.97 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•GRAB converts more revenue to profit (15.97% vs 2.41% net margin).
•GRAB grew revenue faster over the past five years (36.55% vs 12.21% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GRAB	SANM
P/E ratio	22.24	40.97
Forward P/E	20.64	16.44
PEG ratio	N/A	2.30
P/S ratio	3.28	0.96
P/B ratio	1.81	4.80
EV / EBITDA	24.59	15.81
FCF yield	N/A	4.84%

Profitability

Metric	GRAB	SANM
Gross margin	43.63%	9.01%
Operating margin	6.92%	5.09%
Net margin	15.97%	2.41%
ROE	8.81%	12.04%
ROIC	2.70%	8.27%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GRAB	SANM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	36.55%	12.21%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	17.75%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	18.86%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-21.27%	41.47%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GRAB or SANM?: GRAB has the lower trailing P/E: GRAB trades at 22.24 and SANM at 40.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GRAB or SANM?: Over the past five years, GRAB grew revenue faster — GRAB at a 36.55% CAGR versus SANM at 12.21%.
Is GRAB or SANM more profitable?: GRAB runs the higher net margin — GRAB at 15.97% versus SANM at 2.41%.
How have GRAB and SANM total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, GRAB delivered -21.27% and SANM delivered 41.47% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GRAB analysis Full SANM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Grab P/E ratio Sanmina P/E ratio Grab ROE Sanmina ROE Grab operating margin Sanmina operating margin Grab revenue growth Sanmina revenue growth Grab free cash flow Sanmina free cash flow

Grab & Sanmina appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.