Which has grown faster, GPN or RF?

Over the past five years, RF grew revenue faster — GPN at a 3.29% CAGR versus RF at 7.48%.

Does GPN or RF pay a bigger dividend?

GPN yields 1.50% and RF yields 3.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GPN or RF more profitable?

RF runs the higher net margin — GPN at -7.99% versus RF at 23.13%.

Which has been the better investment, GPN or RF?

Over the past 10-year, RF delivered the higher annualized total return — GPN at -0.43% versus RF at 16.29%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Global Payments Inc. (GPN) vs Regions Financial Corporation (RF)

RF leads on 8 of 12 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Global Payments Inc. and Regions Financial Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

GPN

Global Payments Inc.

$15.83B

$66.88Financial Services

Regions Financial Corporation

$24.42B

$28.62Financial Services

Total return — GPN vs RF

growth of $100 · last 25y

GPN +1683.5%RF +28.2%GPN compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

GPN RF

GPN vs RF: by the numbers

•RF is the larger company ($24.42B vs $15.83B market cap).
•RF is profitable (23.13% net margin) while GPN runs a net loss (-7.99%).
•RF grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.48% vs 3.29% CAGR).
•RF pays the higher dividend yield (3.70% vs 1.50%).

Which is better, GPN or RF?

Metric tally: GPN 4 · RF 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthRF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeRF(higher dividend yield)

QualityRF(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GPN	RF
P/E ratio	—	11.93
Forward P/E	4.17●	10.94
P/S ratio	1.82●	2.58
P/B ratio	0.68●	1.32
PEG ratio	—	0.58

Profitability

Metric	GPN	RF
Gross margin	67.31%	75.81%●
Operating margin	16.21%	29.48%●
Net margin	-7.99%	23.13%●
ROE	-2.97%	11.85%●
ROIC	2.50%	13.79%●

Dividends

Metric	GPN	RF
Dividend yield	1.50%	3.70%●
Payout ratio	17.12%	45.89%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GPN	RF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.29%	7.48%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.53%●	17.53%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-18.12%	12.70%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, GPN or RF?: It depends on your goal. growth: RF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RF (higher dividend yield); quality: RF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RF leads 8 to 4.
Which has grown faster, GPN or RF?: Over the past five years, RF grew revenue faster — GPN at a 3.29% CAGR versus RF at 7.48%.
Does GPN or RF pay a bigger dividend?: GPN yields 1.50% and RF yields 3.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GPN or RF more profitable?: RF runs the higher net margin — GPN at -7.99% versus RF at 23.13%.
Which has been the better investment, GPN or RF?: Over the past 10-year, RF delivered the higher annualized total return — GPN at -0.43% versus RF at 16.29%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GPN analysis Full RF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Global Payments P/E ratio Regions Financial P/E ratio Global Payments dividend yield Regions Financial dividend yield Global Payments ROE Regions Financial ROE Global Payments operating margin Regions Financial operating margin Global Payments revenue growth Regions Financial revenue growth Global Payments free cash flow Regions Financial free cash flow

Global Payments & Regions Financial appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.