Genuine Parts Company (GPC) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
A side-by-side comparison of Genuine Parts Company and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: GPC is classified in Consumer Cyclical; MNST is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
GPC
Genuine Parts Company
$129.71Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$97.74Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — GPC vs MNST
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yGPC +1087.3%MNST +457491.3%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
GPC MNST
GPC vs MNST: by the numbers
- •MNST is the larger company ($95.59B vs $17.88B market cap).
- •MNST trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (46.05 vs 532.08 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 0.13% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 7.01% CAGR).
- •GPC pays a dividend (3.28% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GPC | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 532.08 | 46.05 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 41.41 |
| P/S ratio | 0.70 | 10.71 |
| P/B ratio | 3.89 | 10.80 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.10 | 34.17 |
| FCF yield | 4.31% | 2.20% |
Profitability
| Metric | GPC | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.22% | 55.47% |
| Operating margin | 4.01% | 29.34% |
| Net margin | 0.13% | 23.11% |
| ROE | 0.72% | 23.28% |
| ROIC | 9.87% | 21.74% |
Dividends
| Metric | GPC | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.28% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 890.43% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GPC | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.01% | 12.96% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 7.95% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -13.88% | 10.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.71% | 14.91% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, GPC or MNST?
- MNST has the lower trailing P/E: GPC trades at 532.08 and MNST at 46.05. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, GPC or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — GPC at a 7.01% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Does GPC or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- GPC pays a dividend (3.28% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is GPC or MNST more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — GPC at 0.13% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- How have GPC and MNST total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, GPC delivered 5.35% and MNST delivered 13.77% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Genuine Parts P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioGenuine Parts dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldGenuine Parts ROEMonster Beverage ROEGenuine Parts operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginGenuine Parts revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthGenuine Parts free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Genuine Parts & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.