Genuine Parts Company (GPC) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
A side-by-side comparison of Genuine Parts Company and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: GPC is classified in Consumer Cyclical; MNST is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
GPC
Genuine Parts Company
$133.21Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$44.20Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — GPC vs MNST
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yGPC +80.0% (+6.1%/yr)MNST +255.7% (+13.5%/yr)MNST compounded faster over this window
GPC MNST
GPC vs MNST: by the numbers
- •MNST is the larger company ($86.46B vs $18.36B market cap).
- •MNST trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (40.74 vs 555.04 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.08% vs 0.13% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.36% vs 7.01% CAGR).
- •GPC pays a dividend (3.15% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GPC | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 555.04 | 40.74 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 38.09 |
| P/S ratio | 0.73 | 9.38 |
| P/B ratio | 4.06 | 9.23 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.57 | 29.15 |
| FCF yield | 4.13% | 2.43% |
Profitability
| Metric | GPC | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.22% | 55.55% |
| Operating margin | 4.01% | 29.16% |
| Net margin | 0.13% | 23.08% |
| ROE | 0.72% | 22.72% |
| ROIC | 8.03% | 21.32% |
Dividends
| Metric | GPC | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.15% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 1757.29% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GPC | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.01% | 12.36% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 7.95% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -13.88% | 7.93% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.45% | 12.59% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, GPC or MNST?
- MNST has the lower trailing P/E: GPC trades at 555.04 and MNST at 40.74. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, GPC or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — GPC at a 7.01% CAGR versus MNST at 12.36%.
- Does GPC or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- GPC pays a dividend (3.15% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is GPC or MNST more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — GPC at 0.13% versus MNST at 23.08%.
- How have GPC and MNST total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, GPC delivered 6.34% and MNST delivered 13.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Genuine Parts P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioGenuine Parts dividend yieldGenuine Parts ROEMonster Beverage ROEGenuine Parts operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginGenuine Parts revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthGenuine Parts free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Genuine Parts & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.