Gladstone Commercial Corp Pref (GOODN) vs Service Properties Trust (SVC)

A side-by-side comparison of Gladstone Commercial Corp Pref and Service Properties Trust across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — GOODN vs SVC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y
GOODN +31.2% (+3.9%/yr)SVC -93.0% (-31.6%/yr)GOODN compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
1101001kStart $100202120232025$131$7
GOODN SVC

GOODN vs SVC: by the numbers

  • •GOODN is the larger company ($943M vs $852M market cap).
  • •GOODN is profitable (14.55% net margin) while SVC runs a net loss (-25.48%).
  • •SVC grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.63% vs 4.89% CAGR).
  • •GOODN pays the higher dividend yield (8.26% vs 3.01%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricGOODNSVC
P/E ratio38.15N/A
Forward P/E81.00N/A
PEG ratio1.08N/A
P/S ratio5.540.51
P/B ratio5.991.06
EV / EBITDA14.1017.60
FCF yield5.75%N/A

For REITs like Gladstone Commercial Corp Pref, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.

For REITs like Service Properties Trust, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.

Profitability

MetricGOODNSVC
Gross margin5.94%23.25%
Operating margin39.09%11.63%
Net margin14.55%-25.48%
ROE15.74%-52.42%
ROIC5.40%0.08%

Dividends

MetricGOODNSVC
Dividend yield8.26%3.01%
Payout ratio312.03%N/A

Gladstone Commercial Corp Pref's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.

Service Properties Trust's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.

Growth (annualized)

MetricGOODNSVC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)4.89%6.63%
EPS CAGR (5Y)35.43%N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)2.58%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)1.70%-31.86%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, GOODN or SVC?
Over the past five years, SVC grew revenue faster — GOODN at a 4.89% CAGR versus SVC at 6.63%.
Does GOODN or SVC pay a bigger dividend?
GOODN yields 8.26% and SVC yields 3.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GOODN or SVC more profitable?
GOODN runs the higher net margin — GOODN at 14.55% versus SVC at -25.48%.
How have GOODN and SVC total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, GOODN delivered 1.70% and SVC delivered -31.86% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.