Which has the lower trailing P/E, GNW or SEZL?

GNW has the lower trailing P/E: GNW trades at 17.85 and SEZL at 23.45. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GNW or SEZL?

Over the past five years, SEZL grew revenue faster — GNW at a -3.74% CAGR versus SEZL at 42.22%.

Is GNW or SEZL more profitable?

SEZL runs the higher net margin — GNW at 3.03% versus SEZL at 30.35%.

How have GNW and SEZL total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, GNW delivered 19.13% and SEZL delivered 63.90% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Genworth Financial, Inc. (GNW) vs Sezzle Inc. (SEZL)

A side-by-side comparison of Genworth Financial, Inc. and Sezzle Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

GNW

Genworth Financial, Inc.

$3.66B

$9.55Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SEZL

Sezzle Inc.

$3.61B

$107.41Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — GNW vs SEZL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

GNW +177.9% (+18.6%/yr)SEZL +2643.0% (+73.7%/yr)SEZL compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

GNW SEZL

GNW vs SEZL: by the numbers

•GNW is the larger company ($3.66B vs $3.61B market cap).
•GNW trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.85 vs 23.45 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SEZL converts more revenue to profit (30.35% vs 3.03% net margin).
•SEZL grew revenue faster over the past five years (42.22% vs -3.74% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GNW	SEZL
P/E ratio	17.85	23.45
Forward P/E	8.66	20.48
P/S ratio	0.52	6.79
P/B ratio	0.42	15.50

Profitability

Metric	GNW	SEZL
Gross margin	24.28%	90.80%
Operating margin	5.75%	40.39%
Net margin	3.03%	30.35%
ROE	2.43%	69.29%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GNW	SEZL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-3.74%	42.22%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	19.13%	63.90%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GNW or SEZL?: GNW has the lower trailing P/E: GNW trades at 17.85 and SEZL at 23.45. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GNW or SEZL?: Over the past five years, SEZL grew revenue faster — GNW at a -3.74% CAGR versus SEZL at 42.22%.
Is GNW or SEZL more profitable?: SEZL runs the higher net margin — GNW at 3.03% versus SEZL at 30.35%.
How have GNW and SEZL total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, GNW delivered 19.13% and SEZL delivered 63.90% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GNW analysis Full SEZL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Genworth Financial P/E ratio Sezzle P/E ratio Genworth Financial ROE Sezzle ROE Genworth Financial operating margin Sezzle operating margin Genworth Financial revenue growth Sezzle revenue growth

Genworth Financial & Sezzle appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.