Global Mofy Metaverse Limited (GMM) vs 3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (MASK)

Over the past year, GMM lagged MASK — -98.22% vs -94.54% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

A side-by-side comparison of Global Mofy Metaverse Limited and 3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — GMM vs MASK

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 2y
GMM -99.2% (-91.1%/yr)MASK -99.4% (-91.9%/yr)GMM compounded faster over this window
020406080100Start $1002026$1$1
GMM MASK

Metrics side by side

Did GMM beat MASK?

Over the past year, GMM lagged MASK — -98.22% vs -94.54% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Total return (annualized)

MetricGMMMASK
Total return (1Y)-98.22%-94.54%

MASK is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).

Frequently asked

Has GMM beaten MASK?
Over the past year, GMM lagged MASK — -98.22% vs -94.54% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.