Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)
A side-by-side comparison of Globus Medical, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
GMED
Globus Medical, Inc.
$82.54HealthcareDelayed quote: Aug 27, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
$172.58HealthcareDelayed quote: Aug 27, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — GMED vs UHS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yGMED +257.6% (+13.6%/yr)UHS +49.7% (+4.1%/yr)GMED compounded faster over this window
GMED UHS
GMED vs UHS: by the numbers
- •GMED is the larger company ($11.13B vs $10.45B market cap).
- •UHS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (7.08 vs 21.22 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •GMED converts more revenue to profit (17.03% vs 8.42% net margin).
- •GMED grew revenue faster over the past five years (27.65% vs 8.21% CAGR).
- •UHS pays a dividend (0.46% yield), while GMED has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GMED | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.22 | 7.08 |
| Forward P/E | 16.57 | 7.65 |
| P/S ratio | 3.63 | 0.57 |
| P/B ratio | 2.39 | 1.38 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.79 | 5.73 |
| FCF yield | 6.58% | 7.99% |
Profitability
| Metric | GMED | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 68.55% | 90.69% |
| Operating margin | 20.75% | 11.36% |
| Net margin | 17.03% | 8.42% |
| ROE | 11.23% | 20.31% |
| ROIC | 10.49% | 11.74% |
Dividends
| Metric | GMED | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.46% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 3.42% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GMED | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 27.65% | 8.21% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 30.79% | 16.19% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.93% | -12.18% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.22% | 2.47% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, GMED or UHS?
- UHS has the lower trailing P/E: GMED trades at 21.22 and UHS at 7.08. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, GMED or UHS?
- Over the past five years, GMED grew revenue faster — GMED at a 27.65% CAGR versus UHS at 8.21%.
- Does GMED or UHS pay a bigger dividend?
- UHS pays a dividend (0.46% yield), while GMED has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is GMED or UHS more profitable?
- GMED runs the higher net margin — GMED at 17.03% versus UHS at 8.42%.
- How have GMED and UHS total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, GMED delivered 13.76% and UHS delivered 4.20% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Globus Medical P/E ratioUniversal Health Services P/E ratioUniversal Health Services dividend yieldGlobus Medical ROEUniversal Health Services ROEGlobus Medical operating marginUniversal Health Services operating marginGlobus Medical revenue growthUniversal Health Services revenue growthGlobus Medical free cash flowUniversal Health Services free cash flow
Globus Medical & Universal Health Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 28, 2026.