Which has grown faster, GM or NIO?

Over the past five years, NIO grew revenue faster — GM at a 8.60% CAGR versus NIO at 33.07%.

Does GM or NIO pay a bigger dividend?

GM pays a dividend (0.81% yield) while NIO does not currently pay one.

Is GM or NIO more profitable?

GM runs the higher net margin — GM at 1.38% versus NIO at -8.84%.

Which has been the better investment, GM or NIO?

Over the past 5-year, GM delivered the higher annualized total return — GM at 13.06% versus NIO at -35.21%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

General Motors Company (GM) vs NIO Inc. (NIO)

GM leads on 7 of 9 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of General Motors Company and NIO Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

General Motors Company

$73.49B

$81.50Consumer Cyclical

NIO

NIO Inc.

$12.28B

$5.21Consumer Cyclical

Total return — GM vs NIO

growth of $100 · last 8y

GM +139.3%NIO -21.1%GM compounded faster

GM NIO

GM vs NIO: by the numbers

•GM is the larger company ($73.49B vs $12.28B market cap).
•GM is profitable (1.38% net margin) while NIO runs a net loss (-8.84%).
•NIO grew revenue faster over the past five years (33.07% vs 8.60% CAGR).
•GM pays a dividend (0.81% yield) while NIO does not currently pay one.

Which is better, GM or NIO?

Metric tally: GM 7 · NIO 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthNIO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityGM(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	GM	NIO
P/E ratio	32.60	—
Forward P/E	—	8.59
P/S ratio	0.41●	0.90
P/B ratio	1.20●	20.55
EV / EBITDA	11.84	—
FCF yield	16.67%	—

Profitability

Metric	GM	NIO
Gross margin	6.10%	15.74%●
Operating margin	1.34%●	-8.06%
Net margin	1.38%●	-8.84%
ROE	4.05%●	-200.85%
ROIC	1.16%●	-26.94%

Dividends

Metric	GM	NIO
Dividend yield	0.81%	—
Payout ratio	19.82%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GM	NIO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.60%	33.07%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-5.25%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	14.14%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.65%●	-35.21%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GM or NIO?: It depends on your goal. growth: NIO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: GM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GM leads 7 to 2.
Which has grown faster, GM or NIO?: Over the past five years, NIO grew revenue faster — GM at a 8.60% CAGR versus NIO at 33.07%.
Does GM or NIO pay a bigger dividend?: GM pays a dividend (0.81% yield) while NIO does not currently pay one.
Is GM or NIO more profitable?: GM runs the higher net margin — GM at 1.38% versus NIO at -8.84%.
Which has been the better investment, GM or NIO?: Over the past 5-year, GM delivered the higher annualized total return — GM at 13.06% versus NIO at -35.21%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GM analysis Full NIO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

General Motors P/E ratio NIO P/E ratio General Motors dividend yield NIO dividend yield General Motors ROE NIO ROE General Motors operating margin NIO operating margin General Motors revenue growth NIO revenue growth General Motors free cash flow NIO free cash flow

General Motors & NIO appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.