Corning Inc (GLW) vs Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER)
UBER leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Corning Inc and Uber Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — GLW vs UBER
growth of $100 · last 7yGLW +598.3%UBER +83.0%GLW compounded faster
GLW UBER
GLW vs UBER: by the numbers
- •GLW is the larger company ($185.23B vs $154.88B market cap).
- •UBER trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.02 vs 108.58 P/E).
- •UBER converts more revenue to profit (15.91% vs 11.09% net margin).
- •UBER grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.83% vs 5.99% CAGR).
- •GLW pays a dividend (0.49% yield) while UBER does not currently pay one.
Which is better, GLW or UBER?
Metric tally: GLW 3 · UBER 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUBER(lower P/E)
GrowthUBER(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityUBER(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GLW | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 108.58 | 18.02● |
| Forward P/E | 71.52 | 16.37● |
| P/S ratio | 12.05 | 2.79● |
| P/B ratio | 16.65 | 6.05● |
| PEG ratio | 0.22● | 7.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 57.61 | 22.30● |
| FCF yield | 0.76% | 6.55%● |
Profitability
| Metric | GLW | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.31% | 41.03%● |
| Operating margin | 15.31%● | 11.66% |
| Net margin | 11.09% | 15.91%● |
| ROE | 15.32% | 34.50%● |
| ROIC | 7.54% | 11.21%● |
Dividends
| Metric | GLW | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | — |
| Payout ratio | 60.22% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GLW | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.99% | 37.83%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 28.07% | 34.99%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.45% | — |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 42.97%● | 8.02% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, GLW or UBER?
- It depends on your goal. value: UBER (lower P/E); growth: UBER (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: UBER (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UBER leads 12 to 3.
- Is GLW or UBER cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, UBER is cheaper: GLW trades at a 108.58 P/E and UBER at 18.02.
- Which has grown faster, GLW or UBER?
- Over the past five years, UBER grew revenue faster — GLW at a 5.99% CAGR versus UBER at 37.83%.
- Does GLW or UBER pay a bigger dividend?
- GLW pays a dividend (0.49% yield) while UBER does not currently pay one.
- Is GLW or UBER more profitable?
- UBER runs the higher net margin — GLW at 11.09% versus UBER at 15.91%.
- Which has been the better investment, GLW or UBER?
- Over the past 5-year, GLW delivered the higher annualized total return — GLW at 30.28% versus UBER at 8.02%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Corning P/E ratioUber Technologies P/E ratioCorning dividend yieldUber Technologies dividend yieldCorning ROEUber Technologies ROECorning operating marginUber Technologies operating marginCorning revenue growthUber Technologies revenue growthCorning free cash flowUber Technologies free cash flow
Corning & Uber Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.