Corning Inc (GLW) vs Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER)
A side-by-side comparison of Corning Inc and Uber Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
GLW
Corning Inc
$157.74TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 10, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
$78.03TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 10, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — GLW vs UBER
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7yGLW +556.2% (+30.8%/yr)UBER +80.5% (+8.8%/yr)GLW compounded faster over this window
GLW UBER
GLW vs UBER: by the numbers
- •UBER is the larger company ($158.84B vs $135.88B market cap).
- •UBER trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.49 vs 75.31 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •UBER converts more revenue to profit (17.34% vs 11.20% net margin).
- •UBER grew revenue faster over the past five years (33.95% vs 5.24% CAGR).
- •GLW pays a dividend (0.68% yield), while UBER has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GLW | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 75.31 | 16.49 |
| Forward P/E | 50.70 | 22.70 |
| P/S ratio | 8.53 | 2.79 |
| P/B ratio | 11.52 | 5.63 |
| EV / EBITDA | 40.79 | 21.38 |
| FCF yield | 1.66% | 6.58% |
Profitability
| Metric | GLW | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.32% | 42.31% |
| Operating margin | 15.47% | 12.47% |
| Net margin | 11.20% | 17.34% |
| ROE | 15.13% | 35.07% |
| ROIC | 7.54% | 11.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | GLW | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.68% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 60.22% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GLW | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.24% | 33.95% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 28.07% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.86% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 35.70% | 11.12% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, GLW or UBER?
- UBER has the lower trailing P/E: GLW trades at 75.31 and UBER at 16.49. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, GLW or UBER?
- Over the past five years, UBER grew revenue faster — GLW at a 5.24% CAGR versus UBER at 33.95%.
- Does GLW or UBER pay a bigger dividend?
- GLW pays a dividend (0.68% yield), while UBER has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is GLW or UBER more profitable?
- UBER runs the higher net margin — GLW at 11.20% versus UBER at 17.34%.
- How have GLW and UBER total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, GLW delivered 25.17% and UBER delivered 11.12% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Corning P/E ratioUber Technologies P/E ratioCorning dividend yieldCorning ROEUber Technologies ROECorning operating marginUber Technologies operating marginCorning revenue growthUber Technologies revenue growthCorning free cash flowUber Technologies free cash flow
Corning & Uber Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 10, 2026.