Which has the lower trailing P/E, GLW or QCOM?

QCOM has the lower trailing P/E: GLW trades at 75.45 and QCOM at 18.93. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GLW or QCOM?

Over the past five years, QCOM grew revenue faster — GLW at a 5.24% CAGR versus QCOM at 6.23%.

Does GLW or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?

GLW yields 0.67% and QCOM yields 2.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GLW or QCOM more profitable?

QCOM runs the higher net margin — GLW at 11.20% versus QCOM at 21.01%.

How have GLW and QCOM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, GLW delivered 25.07% and QCOM delivered 13.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Corning Inc (GLW) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)

A side-by-side comparison of Corning Inc and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 16, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

GLW

Corning Inc

$150.91B

$175.19TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 17, 2026, 11:35 AM EDT

QCOM

QUALCOMM Incorporated

$171.55B

$163.38TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 17, 2026, 11:35 AM EDT

Total return — GLW vs QCOM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

GLW +843.0% (+25.2%/yr)QCOM +246.4% (+13.2%/yr)GLW compounded faster over this window

GLW QCOM

GLW vs QCOM: by the numbers

•QCOM is the larger company ($171.55B vs $150.91B market cap).
•QCOM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.93 vs 75.45 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•QCOM converts more revenue to profit (21.01% vs 11.20% net margin).
•QCOM grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.23% vs 5.24% CAGR).
•QCOM pays the higher dividend yield (2.17% vs 0.67%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GLW	QCOM
P/E ratio	75.45	18.93
Forward P/E	50.79	15.60
P/S ratio	8.55	4.02
P/B ratio	11.54	6.41
EV / EBITDA	40.87	15.94
FCF yield	1.65%	5.88%

Profitability

Metric	GLW	QCOM
Gross margin	36.32%	54.23%
Operating margin	15.47%	23.19%
Net margin	11.20%	21.01%
ROE	15.13%	33.48%
ROIC	7.54%	13.15%

Dividends

Metric	GLW	QCOM
Dividend yield	0.67%	2.17%
Payout ratio	60.22%	70.95%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GLW	QCOM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.24%	6.23%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	28.07%	2.02%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.86%	2.09%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	36.16%	4.44%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GLW or QCOM?: QCOM has the lower trailing P/E: GLW trades at 75.45 and QCOM at 18.93. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GLW or QCOM?: Over the past five years, QCOM grew revenue faster — GLW at a 5.24% CAGR versus QCOM at 6.23%.
Does GLW or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?: GLW yields 0.67% and QCOM yields 2.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GLW or QCOM more profitable?: QCOM runs the higher net margin — GLW at 11.20% versus QCOM at 21.01%.
How have GLW and QCOM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, GLW delivered 25.07% and QCOM delivered 13.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GLW analysis Full QCOM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Corning P/E ratio QUALCOMM P/E ratio Corning dividend yield QUALCOMM dividend yield Corning ROE QUALCOMM ROE Corning operating margin QUALCOMM operating margin Corning revenue growth QUALCOMM revenue growth Corning free cash flow QUALCOMM free cash flow

Corning & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 16, 2026.