Corning Inc (GLW) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM leads on 14 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Corning Inc and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — GLW vs QCOM
growth of $100 · last 30yGLW +1688.3%QCOM +6552.6%QCOM compounded faster
GLW QCOM
GLW vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •QCOM is the larger company ($215.96B vs $196.34B market cap).
- •QCOM trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.98 vs 108.58 P/E).
- •QCOM converts more revenue to profit (22.31% vs 11.09% net margin).
- •QCOM grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.63% vs 5.99% CAGR).
- •QCOM pays the higher dividend yield (1.75% vs 0.49%).
Which is better, GLW or QCOM?
Metric tally: GLW 3 · QCOM 14It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueQCOM(lower P/E)
GrowthQCOM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeQCOM(higher dividend yield)
QualityQCOM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GLW | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 108.58 | 21.98● |
| Forward P/E | 71.52 | 19.05● |
| P/S ratio | 12.05 | 4.94● |
| P/B ratio | 16.65 | 8.05● |
| PEG ratio | 0.22● | 3.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | 54.05 | 16.19● |
| FCF yield | 0.76% | 5.69%● |
Profitability
| Metric | GLW | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.31% | 54.80%● |
| Operating margin | 15.31% | 25.52%● |
| Net margin | 11.09% | 22.31%● |
| ROE | 15.32% | 36.38%● |
| ROIC | 7.54% | 13.15%● |
Dividends
| Metric | GLW | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 1.75%● |
| Payout ratio | 60.22% | 70.95% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GLW | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.99% | 8.63%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 28.07%● | 5.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.45% | 9.39%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 44.69%● | 10.65% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, GLW or QCOM?
- It depends on your goal. value: QCOM (lower P/E); growth: QCOM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: QCOM (higher dividend yield); quality: QCOM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, QCOM leads 14 to 3.
- Is GLW or QCOM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, QCOM is cheaper: GLW trades at a 108.58 P/E and QCOM at 21.98.
- Which has grown faster, GLW or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, QCOM grew revenue faster — GLW at a 5.99% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
- Does GLW or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- GLW yields 0.49% and QCOM yields 1.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is GLW or QCOM more profitable?
- QCOM runs the higher net margin — GLW at 11.09% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
- Which has been the better investment, GLW or QCOM?
- Over the past 10-year, GLW delivered the higher annualized total return — GLW at 31.06% versus QCOM at 17.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Corning P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioCorning dividend yieldQUALCOMM dividend yieldCorning ROEQUALCOMM ROECorning operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginCorning revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthCorning free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
Corning & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.