Which has the lower trailing P/E, GLBS or WFCF?

GLBS has the lower trailing P/E: GLBS trades at 10.24 and WFCF at 48.04. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GLBS or WFCF?

Over the past five years, GLBS grew revenue faster — GLBS at a 22.53% CAGR versus WFCF at 3.25%.

Is GLBS or WFCF more profitable?

GLBS runs the higher net margin — GLBS at 12.72% versus WFCF at 5.78%.

How have GLBS and WFCF total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, GLBS delivered -49.01% and WFCF delivered 3.65% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) vs Where Food Comes From Inc (WFCF)

A side-by-side comparison of Globus Maritime Limited and Where Food Comes From Inc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

GLBS

Globus Maritime Limited

$70M

$3.24IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:34 PM EDT

WFCF

Where Food Comes From Inc

$68M

$13.46IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:35 PM EDT

Total return — GLBS vs WFCF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

GLBS -99.9% (-49.0%/yr)WFCF +34.2% (+3.0%/yr)WFCF compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

GLBS WFCF

GLBS vs WFCF: by the numbers

•GLBS is the larger company ($70M vs $68M market cap).
•GLBS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.24 vs 48.04 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•GLBS converts more revenue to profit (12.72% vs 5.78% net margin).
•GLBS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.53% vs 3.25% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GLBS	WFCF
P/E ratio	10.24	48.04
Forward P/E	5.89	36.38
PEG ratio	N/A	7.51
P/S ratio	1.32	2.71
P/B ratio	0.39	7.69
EV / EBITDA	5.52	30.60
FCF yield	11.99%	1.48%

Profitability

Metric	GLBS	WFCF
Gross margin	20.87%	38.27%
Operating margin	5.42%	5.90%
Net margin	12.72%	5.78%
ROE	3.72%	16.41%
ROIC	4.28%	10.77%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GLBS	WFCF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.53%	3.25%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	6.40%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-12.62%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	3.69%	-0.75%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GLBS or WFCF?: GLBS has the lower trailing P/E: GLBS trades at 10.24 and WFCF at 48.04. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GLBS or WFCF?: Over the past five years, GLBS grew revenue faster — GLBS at a 22.53% CAGR versus WFCF at 3.25%.
Is GLBS or WFCF more profitable?: GLBS runs the higher net margin — GLBS at 12.72% versus WFCF at 5.78%.
How have GLBS and WFCF total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, GLBS delivered -49.01% and WFCF delivered 3.65% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GLBS analysis Full WFCF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Globus Maritime P/E ratio Where Food Comes From P/E ratio Globus Maritime ROE Where Food Comes From ROE Globus Maritime operating margin Where Food Comes From operating margin Globus Maritime revenue growth Where Food Comes From revenue growth Globus Maritime free cash flow Where Food Comes From free cash flow

Globus Maritime & Where Food Comes From appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.