General Mills, Inc. (GIS) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
GIS leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of General Mills, Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
$34.51Consumer Defensive
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$148.51Consumer Defensive
Total return — GIS vs STZ
growth of $100 · last 30yGIS +153.9%STZ +3669.3%STZ compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
GIS STZ
GIS vs STZ: by the numbers
- •STZ is the larger company ($25.47B vs $18.42B market cap).
- •GIS trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.46 vs 15.49 P/E).
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (18.46% vs 12.05% net margin).
- •STZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (1.19% vs 0.09% CAGR).
- •GIS pays the higher dividend yield (7.07% vs 2.75%).
Which is better, GIS or STZ?
Metric tally: GIS 9 · STZ 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueGIS(lower P/E)
GrowthSTZ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeGIS(higher dividend yield)
QualitySTZ(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GIS | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 8.46● | 15.49 |
| Forward P/E | 10.93● | 11.90 |
| P/S ratio | 1.02● | 2.82 |
| P/B ratio | 2.00● | 3.19 |
| PEG ratio | 1.43 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.45● | 11.70 |
| FCF yield | 8.81%● | 6.95% |
Profitability
| Metric | GIS | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 32.97% | 51.67%● |
| Operating margin | 19.07% | 31.33%● |
| Net margin | 12.05% | 18.46%● |
| ROE | 23.70%● | 20.87% |
| ROIC | 9.62% | 10.48%● |
Dividends
| Metric | GIS | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 7.07%● | 2.75% |
| Payout ratio | 59.22% | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GIS | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.09% | 1.19%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.92%● | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -11.45% | -1.57%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -7.83% | -7.36%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, GIS or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: GIS (lower P/E); growth: STZ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: GIS (higher dividend yield); quality: STZ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GIS leads 9 to 7.
- Is GIS or STZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, GIS is cheaper: GIS trades at a 8.46 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
- Which has grown faster, GIS or STZ?
- Over the past five years, STZ grew revenue faster — GIS at a 0.09% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does GIS or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- GIS yields 7.07% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is GIS or STZ more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — GIS at 12.05% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, GIS or STZ?
- Over the past 10-year, STZ delivered the higher annualized total return — GIS at -2.68% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
General Mills P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioGeneral Mills dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldGeneral Mills ROEConstellation Brands ROEGeneral Mills operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginGeneral Mills revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthGeneral Mills free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
General Mills & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.