General Mills, Inc. (GIS) vs McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC)
GIS leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics, though MKC is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of General Mills, Inc. and McCormick & Company, Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
$34.51Consumer Defensive
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
$48.95Consumer Defensive
Total return — GIS vs MKC
growth of $100 · last 30yGIS +149.3%MKC +780.4%MKC compounded faster
GIS MKC
GIS vs MKC: by the numbers
- •GIS is the larger company ($18.42B vs $13.16B market cap).
- •MKC trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.02 vs 8.46 P/E).
- •MKC converts more revenue to profit (23.12% vs 12.05% net margin).
- •MKC grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.90% vs 0.09% CAGR).
- •GIS pays the higher dividend yield (7.07% vs 3.80%).
Which is better, GIS or MKC?
Metric tally: GIS 10 · MKC 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMKC(lower P/E)
GrowthMKC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeGIS(higher dividend yield)
QualityGIS(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | GIS | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 8.46 | 8.02● |
| Forward P/E | 10.91● | 14.75 |
| P/S ratio | 1.02● | 1.86 |
| P/B ratio | 2.00 | 1.89● |
| PEG ratio | 1.43● | 8.19 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.45● | 14.63 |
| FCF yield | 8.81%● | 6.45% |
Profitability
| Metric | GIS | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 32.97% | 37.94%● |
| Operating margin | 19.07%● | 15.51% |
| Net margin | 12.05% | 23.12%● |
| ROE | 23.70% | 23.54% |
| ROIC | 9.62%● | 7.93% |
Dividends
| Metric | GIS | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 7.07%● | 3.80% |
| Payout ratio | 59.22% | 63.27% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GIS | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.09% | 3.90%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.92%● | 0.98% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -11.45% | 3.15%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -7.83%● | -9.28% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, GIS or MKC?
- It depends on your goal. value: MKC (lower P/E); growth: MKC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: GIS (higher dividend yield); quality: GIS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GIS leads 10 to 6.
- Is GIS or MKC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MKC is cheaper: GIS trades at a 8.46 P/E and MKC at 8.02.
- Which has grown faster, GIS or MKC?
- Over the past five years, MKC grew revenue faster — GIS at a 0.09% CAGR versus MKC at 3.90%.
- Does GIS or MKC pay a bigger dividend?
- GIS yields 7.07% and MKC yields 3.80% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is GIS or MKC more profitable?
- MKC runs the higher net margin — GIS at 12.05% versus MKC at 23.12%.
- Which has been the better investment, GIS or MKC?
- Over the past 10-year, MKC delivered the higher annualized total return — GIS at -2.68% versus MKC at 1.73%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
General Mills P/E ratioMcCormick & P/E ratioGeneral Mills dividend yieldMcCormick & dividend yieldGeneral Mills ROEMcCormick & ROEGeneral Mills operating marginMcCormick & operating marginGeneral Mills revenue growthMcCormick & revenue growthGeneral Mills free cash flowMcCormick & free cash flow
General Mills & McCormick & appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.