Which has the lower trailing P/E, GILT or TASK?

TASK has the lower trailing P/E: GILT trades at 20.85 and TASK at 6.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GILT or TASK?

Over the past five years, GILT grew revenue faster — GILT at a 22.33% CAGR versus TASK at 15.61%.

Does GILT or TASK pay a bigger dividend?

TASK pays a dividend (45.48% yield), while GILT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is GILT or TASK more profitable?

TASK runs the higher net margin — GILT at 6.21% versus TASK at 8.75%.

How have GILT and TASK total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, GILT delivered 2.15% and TASK delivered -26.76% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT) vs TaskUs, Inc. (TASK)

A side-by-side comparison of Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. and TaskUs, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

GILT

Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.

$689M

$9.13TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:05 PM EDT

TASK

TaskUs, Inc.

$723M

$8.02TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:04 PM EDT

Total return — GILT vs TASK

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

GILT -14.3% (-3.0%/yr)TASK -59.5% (-16.5%/yr)GILT compounded faster over this window

GILT TASK

GILT vs TASK: by the numbers

•TASK is the larger company ($723M vs $689M market cap).
•TASK trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (6.97 vs 20.85 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•TASK converts more revenue to profit (8.75% vs 6.21% net margin).
•GILT grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.33% vs 15.61% CAGR).
•TASK pays a dividend (45.48% yield), while GILT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GILT	TASK
P/E ratio	20.85	6.97
Forward P/E	14.85	6.04
PEG ratio	N/A	0.28
P/S ratio	1.41	0.59
P/B ratio	1.27	2.41
EV / EBITDA	11.78	5.23
FCF yield	N/A	16.68%

Profitability

Metric	GILT	TASK
Gross margin	30.33%	34.03%
Operating margin	4.69%	11.74%
Net margin	6.21%	8.75%
ROE	5.56%	35.81%
ROIC	4.01%	12.36%

Dividends

Metric	GILT	TASK
Dividend yield	N/A	45.48%
Payout ratio	N/A	317.39%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GILT	TASK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.33%	15.61%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-11.09%	25.93%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	20.02%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	2.15%	-26.76%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GILT or TASK?: TASK has the lower trailing P/E: GILT trades at 20.85 and TASK at 6.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GILT or TASK?: Over the past five years, GILT grew revenue faster — GILT at a 22.33% CAGR versus TASK at 15.61%.
Does GILT or TASK pay a bigger dividend?: TASK pays a dividend (45.48% yield), while GILT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is GILT or TASK more profitable?: TASK runs the higher net margin — GILT at 6.21% versus TASK at 8.75%.
How have GILT and TASK total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, GILT delivered 2.15% and TASK delivered -26.76% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GILT analysis Full TASK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Gilat Satellite Networks P/E ratio TaskUs P/E ratio TaskUs dividend yield Gilat Satellite Networks ROE TaskUs ROE Gilat Satellite Networks operating margin TaskUs operating margin Gilat Satellite Networks revenue growth TaskUs revenue growth Gilat Satellite Networks free cash flow TaskUs free cash flow

Gilat Satellite Networks & TaskUs appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.