Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) vs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG)
GILD leads on 14 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
$125.59Healthcare
ISRG
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
$411.06Healthcare
Total return — GILD vs ISRG
growth of $100 · last 26yGILD +6026.3%ISRG +20149.3%ISRG compounded faster
GILD ISRG
GILD vs ISRG: by the numbers
- •GILD is the larger company ($155.93B vs $145.58B market cap).
- •GILD trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.11 vs 49.83 P/E).
- •GILD converts more revenue to profit (30.99% vs 28.15% net margin).
- •ISRG grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.39% vs 3.07% CAGR).
- •GILD pays a dividend (1.91% yield) while ISRG does not currently pay one.
Which is better, GILD or ISRG?
Metric tally: GILD 14 · ISRG 2It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueGILD(lower P/E)
GrowthISRG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityGILD(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | GILD | ISRG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 17.11● | 49.83 |
| Forward P/E | 13.00● | 34.90 |
| P/S ratio | 5.30● | 13.98 |
| P/B ratio | 6.70● | 8.46 |
| PEG ratio | 0.01● | 3.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.91● | 35.41 |
| FCF yield | 6.49%● | 1.92% |
Profitability
| Metric | GILD | ISRG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 79.35%● | 66.29% |
| Operating margin | 38.26%● | 30.45% |
| Net margin | 30.99%● | 28.15% |
| ROE | 39.19%● | 17.05% |
| ROIC | 21.53%● | 13.71% |
Dividends
| Metric | GILD | ISRG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | — |
| Payout ratio | 35.09% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GILD | ISRG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.07% | 18.39%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 133.83%● | 21.51% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.30% | 16.61%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 17.06%● | 7.37% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, GILD or ISRG?
- It depends on your goal. value: GILD (lower P/E); growth: ISRG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: GILD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GILD leads 14 to 2.
- Is GILD or ISRG cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, GILD is cheaper: GILD trades at a 17.11 P/E and ISRG at 49.83.
- Which has grown faster, GILD or ISRG?
- Over the past five years, ISRG grew revenue faster — GILD at a 3.07% CAGR versus ISRG at 18.39%.
- Does GILD or ISRG pay a bigger dividend?
- GILD pays a dividend (1.91% yield) while ISRG does not currently pay one.
- Is GILD or ISRG more profitable?
- GILD runs the higher net margin — GILD at 30.99% versus ISRG at 28.15%.
- Which has been the better investment, GILD or ISRG?
- Over the past 10-year, ISRG delivered the higher annualized total return — GILD at 7.79% versus ISRG at 19.14%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Gilead Sciences P/E ratioIntuitive Surgical P/E ratioGilead Sciences dividend yieldIntuitive Surgical dividend yieldGilead Sciences ROEIntuitive Surgical ROEGilead Sciences operating marginIntuitive Surgical operating marginGilead Sciences revenue growthIntuitive Surgical revenue growthGilead Sciences free cash flowIntuitive Surgical free cash flow
Gilead Sciences & Intuitive Surgical appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.