GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) vs Zscaler, Inc. (ZS)

A side-by-side comparison of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Zscaler, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnGFS vs ZS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y
GFS -2.7% (-0.5%/yr)ZS -47.5% (-12.1%/yr)GFS compounded faster over this window
50100150200Start $10020222023202420252026$97$53
GFS ZS

GFS vs ZS: by the numbers

  • ZS is the larger company ($26.61B vs $25.76B market cap).
  • GFS is profitable (10.32% net margin) while ZS runs a net loss (-1.88%).
  • ZS grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.87% vs 5.97% CAGR).
  • GFS pays a dividend (0.26% yield), while ZS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricGFSZS
P/E ratio36.68N/A
Forward P/E24.2333.76
P/S ratio3.717.94
P/B ratio2.1810.24
EV / EBITDA12.71468.72
FCF yield3.09%2.94%

Profitability

MetricGFSZS
Gross margin27.43%76.80%
Operating margin11.59%-3.98%
Net margin10.32%-1.88%
ROE6.06%-2.43%
ROIC4.47%-2.72%

Dividends

MetricGFSZS
Dividend yield0.26%N/A
Payout ratio9.38%N/A

Growth (annualized)

MetricGFSZS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)5.97%37.87%
FCF CAGR (5Y)35.25%42.77%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A-9.93%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, GFS or ZS?
Over the past five years, ZS grew revenue faster — GFS at a 5.97% CAGR versus ZS at 37.87%.
Does GFS or ZS pay a bigger dividend?
GFS pays a dividend (0.26% yield), while ZS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is GFS or ZS more profitable?
GFS runs the higher net margin — GFS at 10.32% versus ZS at -1.88%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.