Which has the lower trailing P/E, GFS or ZM?

ZM has the lower trailing P/E: GFS trades at 37.01 and ZM at 8.29. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GFS or ZM?

Over the past five years, ZM grew revenue faster — GFS at a 5.97% CAGR versus ZM at 6.54%.

Does GFS or ZM pay a bigger dividend?

GFS pays a dividend (0.26% yield), while ZM has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is GFS or ZM more profitable?

ZM runs the higher net margin — GFS at 10.32% versus ZM at 65.19%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) vs Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM)

A side-by-side comparison of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Zoom Communications, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

GFS

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.

$25.99B

$47.37TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 3:00 PM EDT

Zoom Communications, Inc.

$26.20B

$89.35TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 2:55 PM EDT

Total return — GFS vs ZM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

GFS -2.7% (-0.5%/yr)ZM -65.2% (-19.0%/yr)GFS compounded faster over this window

GFS ZM

GFS vs ZM: by the numbers

•ZM is the larger company ($26.20B vs $25.99B market cap).
•ZM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.29 vs 37.01 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ZM converts more revenue to profit (65.19% vs 10.32% net margin).
•ZM grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.54% vs 5.97% CAGR).
•GFS pays a dividend (0.26% yield), while ZM has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GFS	ZM
P/E ratio	37.01	8.29
Forward P/E	24.45	14.54
P/S ratio	3.75	5.25
P/B ratio	2.20	2.32
EV / EBITDA	12.82	18.24
FCF yield	3.06%	7.35%

Profitability

Metric	GFS	ZM
Gross margin	27.43%	77.30%
Operating margin	11.59%	23.73%
Net margin	10.32%	65.19%
ROE	6.06%	28.80%
ROIC	4.47%	8.02%

Dividends

Metric	GFS	ZM
Dividend yield	0.26%	N/A
Payout ratio	9.38%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GFS	ZM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.97%	6.54%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	21.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	35.25%	2.88%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-20.13%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GFS or ZM?: ZM has the lower trailing P/E: GFS trades at 37.01 and ZM at 8.29. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GFS or ZM?: Over the past five years, ZM grew revenue faster — GFS at a 5.97% CAGR versus ZM at 6.54%.
Does GFS or ZM pay a bigger dividend?: GFS pays a dividend (0.26% yield), while ZM has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is GFS or ZM more profitable?: ZM runs the higher net margin — GFS at 10.32% versus ZM at 65.19%.

Go deeper

Full GFS analysis Full ZM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

GLOBALFOUNDRIES P/E ratio Zoom Communications P/E ratio GLOBALFOUNDRIES dividend yield GLOBALFOUNDRIES ROE Zoom Communications ROE GLOBALFOUNDRIES operating margin Zoom Communications operating margin GLOBALFOUNDRIES revenue growth Zoom Communications revenue growth GLOBALFOUNDRIES free cash flow Zoom Communications free cash flow

GLOBALFOUNDRIES & Zoom Communications appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.