Which has the lower trailing P/E, GFS or ZM?

ZM has the lower trailing P/E: GFS trades at 38.51 and ZM at 12.94. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GFS or ZM?

Over the past five years, ZM grew revenue faster — GFS at a 6.81% CAGR versus ZM at 8.51%.

Does GFS or ZM pay a bigger dividend?

GFS pays a dividend (0.22% yield), while ZM has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is GFS or ZM more profitable?

ZM runs the higher net margin — GFS at 11.37% versus ZM at 41.99%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) vs Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM)

A side-by-side comparison of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Zoom Communications, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 27, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

GFS

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.

$28.91B

$52.68TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 27, 2026, 3:15 PM EDT

Zoom Communications, Inc.

$26.64B

$90.84TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 27, 2026, 3:15 PM EDT

Total return — GFS vs ZM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

GFS +11.6%ZM -67.4%GFS compounded faster

GFS ZM

GFS vs ZM: by the numbers

•GFS is the larger company ($28.91B vs $26.64B market cap).
•ZM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.94 vs 38.51 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ZM converts more revenue to profit (41.99% vs 11.37% net margin).
•ZM grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.51% vs 6.81% CAGR).
•GFS pays a dividend (0.22% yield), while ZM has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GFS	ZM
P/E ratio	38.51	12.94
Forward P/E	28.27	14.75
P/S ratio	4.39	5.36
P/B ratio	2.57	2.65
PEG ratio	N/A	0.16
EV / EBITDA	14.16	19.09
FCF yield	3.58%	7.42%

Profitability

Metric	GFS	ZM
Gross margin	26.40%	77.40%
Operating margin	12.08%	24.17%
Net margin	11.37%	41.99%
ROE	6.65%	20.77%
ROIC	5.20%	8.82%

Dividends

Metric	GFS	ZM
Dividend yield	0.22%	N/A
Payout ratio	7.55%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GFS	ZM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.81%	8.51%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	21.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	45.78%	4.31%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-24.48%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GFS or ZM?: ZM has the lower trailing P/E: GFS trades at 38.51 and ZM at 12.94. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GFS or ZM?: Over the past five years, ZM grew revenue faster — GFS at a 6.81% CAGR versus ZM at 8.51%.
Does GFS or ZM pay a bigger dividend?: GFS pays a dividend (0.22% yield), while ZM has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is GFS or ZM more profitable?: ZM runs the higher net margin — GFS at 11.37% versus ZM at 41.99%.

Go deeper

Full GFS analysis Full ZM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

GLOBALFOUNDRIES P/E ratio Zoom Communications P/E ratio GLOBALFOUNDRIES dividend yield Zoom Communications dividend yield GLOBALFOUNDRIES ROE Zoom Communications ROE GLOBALFOUNDRIES operating margin Zoom Communications operating margin GLOBALFOUNDRIES revenue growth Zoom Communications revenue growth GLOBALFOUNDRIES free cash flow Zoom Communications free cash flow

GLOBALFOUNDRIES & Zoom Communications appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 27, 2026.