Which has the lower trailing P/E, GFS or TSEM?

GFS has the lower trailing P/E: GFS trades at 37.36 and TSEM at 88.38. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GFS or TSEM?

Over the past five years, GFS grew revenue faster — GFS at a 5.97% CAGR versus TSEM at 4.61%.

Does GFS or TSEM pay a bigger dividend?

GFS pays a dividend (0.26% yield), while TSEM is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is GFS or TSEM more profitable?

TSEM runs the higher net margin — GFS at 10.32% versus TSEM at 16.94%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) vs Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (TSEM)

A side-by-side comparison of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Tower Semiconductor Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

GFS

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.

$26.24B

$47.82TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

TSEM

Tower Semiconductor Ltd.

$25.23B

$223.60TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — GFS vs TSEM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

GFS -2.7% (-0.5%/yr)TSEM +575.7% (+46.5%/yr)TSEM compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

GFS TSEM

GFS vs TSEM: by the numbers

•GFS is the larger company ($26.24B vs $25.23B market cap).
•GFS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (37.36 vs 88.38 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•TSEM converts more revenue to profit (16.94% vs 10.32% net margin).
•GFS grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.97% vs 4.61% CAGR).
•GFS pays a dividend (0.26% yield), while TSEM is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GFS	TSEM
P/E ratio	37.36	88.38
Forward P/E	24.68	57.85
P/S ratio	3.78	14.76
P/B ratio	2.22	8.17
EV / EBITDA	12.94	42.20
FCF yield	3.03%	1.21%

Profitability

Metric	GFS	TSEM
Gross margin	27.43%	26.87%
Operating margin	11.59%	16.16%
Net margin	10.32%	16.94%
ROE	6.06%	9.38%
ROIC	4.47%	7.37%

Dividends

Metric	GFS	TSEM
Dividend yield	0.26%	N/A
Payout ratio	9.38%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GFS	TSEM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.97%	4.61%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	20.30%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	35.25%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	N/A	49.43%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GFS or TSEM?: GFS has the lower trailing P/E: GFS trades at 37.36 and TSEM at 88.38. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GFS or TSEM?: Over the past five years, GFS grew revenue faster — GFS at a 5.97% CAGR versus TSEM at 4.61%.
Does GFS or TSEM pay a bigger dividend?: GFS pays a dividend (0.26% yield), while TSEM is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is GFS or TSEM more profitable?: TSEM runs the higher net margin — GFS at 10.32% versus TSEM at 16.94%.

Go deeper

Full GFS analysis Full TSEM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

GLOBALFOUNDRIES P/E ratio Tower Semiconductor P/E ratio GLOBALFOUNDRIES dividend yield GLOBALFOUNDRIES ROE Tower Semiconductor ROE GLOBALFOUNDRIES operating margin Tower Semiconductor operating margin GLOBALFOUNDRIES revenue growth Tower Semiconductor revenue growth GLOBALFOUNDRIES free cash flow Tower Semiconductor free cash flow

GLOBALFOUNDRIES & Tower Semiconductor appear in these rankings

Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.