Is GFS or ON cheaper?

On trailing earnings, GFS is cheaper: GFS trades at a 58.55 P/E and ON at 82.83.

Which has grown faster, GFS or ON?

Over the past five years, GFS grew revenue faster — GFS at a 6.81% CAGR versus ON at 2.12%.

Does GFS or ON pay a bigger dividend?

GFS pays a dividend (0.15% yield) while ON does not currently pay one.

Is GFS or ON more profitable?

GFS runs the higher net margin — GFS at 11.37% versus ON at 9.46%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) vs ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON)

GFS leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and ON Semiconductor Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

ON Semiconductor Corporation

$45.77B

$116.79Technology

Total return — GFS vs ON

growth of $100 · last 5y

GFS +75.4%ON +148.0%ON compounded faster

GFS ON

GFS vs ON: by the numbers

•ON is the larger company ($45.77B vs $44.63B market cap).
•GFS trades at the lower earnings multiple (58.55 vs 82.83 P/E).
•GFS converts more revenue to profit (11.37% vs 9.46% net margin).
•GFS grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.81% vs 2.12% CAGR).
•GFS pays a dividend (0.15% yield) while ON does not currently pay one.

Which is better, GFS or ON?

Metric tally: GFS 8 · ON 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueGFS(lower P/E)

GrowthGFS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityON(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	GFS	ON
P/E ratio	58.55●	82.83
Forward P/E	42.97	37.82●
P/S ratio	6.67●	7.59
P/B ratio	3.90●	6.30
EV / EBITDA	20.82●	38.67
FCF yield	2.35%	3.16%●

Profitability

Metric	GFS	ON
Gross margin	26.40%	37.22%●
Operating margin	12.08%●	10.84%
Net margin	11.37%●	9.46%
ROE	6.65%	7.86%●
ROIC	5.23%	6.24%●

Dividends

Metric	GFS	ON
Dividend yield	0.15%	—
Payout ratio	7.55%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GFS	ON
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.81%●	2.12%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	-12.64%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	45.78%●	23.39%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	—	25.31%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GFS or ON?: It depends on your goal. value: GFS (lower P/E); growth: GFS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ON (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GFS leads 8 to 5.
Is GFS or ON cheaper?: On trailing earnings, GFS is cheaper: GFS trades at a 58.55 P/E and ON at 82.83.
Which has grown faster, GFS or ON?: Over the past five years, GFS grew revenue faster — GFS at a 6.81% CAGR versus ON at 2.12%.
Does GFS or ON pay a bigger dividend?: GFS pays a dividend (0.15% yield) while ON does not currently pay one.
Is GFS or ON more profitable?: GFS runs the higher net margin — GFS at 11.37% versus ON at 9.46%.

Go deeper

Full GFS analysis Full ON analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

GLOBALFOUNDRIES P/E ratio ON Semiconductor P/E ratio GLOBALFOUNDRIES dividend yield ON Semiconductor dividend yield GLOBALFOUNDRIES ROE ON Semiconductor ROE GLOBALFOUNDRIES operating margin ON Semiconductor operating margin GLOBALFOUNDRIES revenue growth ON Semiconductor revenue growth GLOBALFOUNDRIES free cash flow ON Semiconductor free cash flow

GLOBALFOUNDRIES & ON Semiconductor appear in these rankings

Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.