GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) vs Jabil Inc. (JBL)
JBL leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Jabil Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 1, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — GFS vs JBL
growth of $100 · last 5yGFS +77.6%JBL +535.5%JBL compounded faster
GFS JBL
GFS vs JBL: by the numbers
- •GFS is the larger company ($45.22B vs $40.67B market cap).
- •JBL trades at the lower earnings multiple (50.14 vs 59.29 P/E).
- •GFS converts more revenue to profit (11.37% vs 2.57% net margin).
- •GFS grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.81% vs 2.86% CAGR).
- •GFS pays the higher dividend yield (0.15% vs 0.09%).
Which is better, GFS or JBL?
Metric tally: GFS 6 · JBL 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueJBL(lower P/E)
GrowthGFS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityJBL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GFS | JBL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 59.29 | 50.14● |
| Forward P/E | 43.54 | 29.29● |
| P/S ratio | 6.76 | 1.23● |
| P/B ratio | 3.95● | 29.91 |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.62 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.83 | 19.79● |
| FCF yield | 2.32% | 3.66%● |
Profitability
| Metric | GFS | JBL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 26.40%● | 9.23% |
| Operating margin | 12.08%● | 4.32% |
| Net margin | 11.37%● | 2.57% |
| ROE | 6.65% | 65.15%● |
| ROIC | 5.20% | 16.06%● |
Dividends
| Metric | GFS | JBL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.15%● | 0.09% |
| Payout ratio | 7.55% | 5.33% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GFS | JBL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.81%● | 2.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | — | 75.55% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 45.78% | 59.60%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | — | 46.16% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, GFS or JBL?
- It depends on your goal. value: JBL (lower P/E); growth: GFS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: JBL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, JBL leads 8 to 6.
- Is GFS or JBL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, JBL is cheaper: GFS trades at a 59.29 P/E and JBL at 50.14.
- Which has grown faster, GFS or JBL?
- Over the past five years, GFS grew revenue faster — GFS at a 6.81% CAGR versus JBL at 2.86%.
- Does GFS or JBL pay a bigger dividend?
- GFS yields 0.15% and JBL yields 0.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is GFS or JBL more profitable?
- GFS runs the higher net margin — GFS at 11.37% versus JBL at 2.57%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
GLOBALFOUNDRIES P/E ratioJabil P/E ratioGLOBALFOUNDRIES dividend yieldJabil dividend yieldGLOBALFOUNDRIES ROEJabil ROEGLOBALFOUNDRIES operating marginJabil operating marginGLOBALFOUNDRIES revenue growthJabil revenue growthGLOBALFOUNDRIES free cash flowJabil free cash flow
GLOBALFOUNDRIES & Jabil appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 1, 2026.