The New Germany Fund, Inc. (GF) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)
GF leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of The New Germany Fund, Inc. and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
GF
The New Germany Fund, Inc.
$11.50Financial Services
NMS
Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund
$12.00Financial Services
Total return — GF vs NMS
growth of $100 · last 12yGF -29.4%NMS -20.0%NMS compounded faster
GF NMS
GF vs NMS: by the numbers
- •GF is the larger company ($187M vs $75M market cap).
- •GF trades at the lower earnings multiple (5.25 vs 11.21 P/E).
- •GF converts more revenue to profit (286.83% vs 87.52% net margin).
- •GF grew revenue faster over the past five years (-3.04% vs -7.24% CAGR).
- •NMS pays the higher dividend yield (6.30% vs 2.68%).
Which is better, GF or NMS?
Metric tally: GF 10 · NMS 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueGF(lower P/E)
GrowthGF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeNMS(higher dividend yield)
QualityGF(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GF | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 5.25● | 11.21 |
| Forward P/E | 5.07 | — |
| P/S ratio | 15.11 | 9.91● |
| P/B ratio | 0.91● | 1.00 |
| PEG ratio | 0.02● | 2.28 |
Profitability
| Metric | GF | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 38.92%● | -4.36% |
| Operating margin | 1763.53%● | -12.54% |
| Net margin | 286.83%● | 87.52% |
| ROE | 17.19%● | 8.85% |
| ROIC | 26.89%● | -0.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | GF | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.68% | 6.30%● |
| Payout ratio | 8.98% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GF | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -3.04%● | -7.24% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -11.39%● | -22.02% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -8.60% | -0.65%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, GF or NMS?
- It depends on your goal. value: GF (lower P/E); growth: GF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NMS (higher dividend yield); quality: GF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GF leads 10 to 3.
- Is GF or NMS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, GF is cheaper: GF trades at a 5.25 P/E and NMS at 11.21.
- Which has grown faster, GF or NMS?
- Over the past five years, GF grew revenue faster — GF at a -3.04% CAGR versus NMS at -7.24%.
- Does GF or NMS pay a bigger dividend?
- GF yields 2.68% and NMS yields 6.30% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is GF or NMS more profitable?
- GF runs the higher net margin — GF at 286.83% versus NMS at 87.52%.
- Which has been the better investment, GF or NMS?
- Over the past 10-year, GF delivered the higher annualized total return — GF at 5.87% versus NMS at 1.71%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
New Germany Fund P/E ratioNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund P/E ratioNew Germany Fund dividend yieldNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yieldNew Germany Fund ROENuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund ROENew Germany Fund operating marginNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund operating marginNew Germany Fund revenue growthNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growthNew Germany Fund free cash flowNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund free cash flow
New Germany Fund & Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.