Which has the lower trailing P/E, GF or NMS?

GF has the lower trailing P/E: GF trades at 5.30 and NMS at 10.79. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GF or NMS?

Over the past five years, NMS grew revenue faster — GF at a -42.09% CAGR versus NMS at 9.23%.

Does GF or NMS pay a bigger dividend?

GF yields 2.44% and NMS yields 6.91% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GF or NMS more profitable?

GF runs the higher net margin — GF at 1770.99% versus NMS at 130.68%.

How have GF and NMS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, GF delivered 5.01% and NMS delivered 0.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The New Germany Fund, Inc. (GF) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)

A side-by-side comparison of The New Germany Fund, Inc. and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

The New Germany Fund, Inc.

$188M

$11.61Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 2:07 PM EDT

NMS

Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund

$74M

$11.55Financial ServicesAt close: Aug 12, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — GF vs NMS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

GF +64.5% (+5.1%/yr)NMS +9.4% (+0.9%/yr)GF compounded faster over this window

GF NMS

GF vs NMS: by the numbers

•GF is the larger company ($188M vs $74M market cap).
•GF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (5.30 vs 10.79 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•GF converts more revenue to profit (1770.99% vs 130.68% net margin).
•NMS grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.23% vs -42.09% CAGR).
•NMS pays the higher dividend yield (6.91% vs 2.44%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GF	NMS
P/E ratio	5.30	10.79
Forward P/E	5.12	N/A
P/S ratio	15.25	9.54
P/B ratio	0.91	0.88

Profitability

Metric	GF	NMS
Gross margin	38.92%	85.04%
Operating margin	1763.53%	162.66%
Net margin	1770.99%	130.68%
ROE	27.02%	-0.33%
ROIC	26.89%	7.04%

Dividends

Metric	GF	NMS
Dividend yield	2.44%	6.91%
Payout ratio	8.27%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GF	NMS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-42.09%	9.23%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-11.39%	-22.02%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-8.91%	-0.84%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GF or NMS?: GF has the lower trailing P/E: GF trades at 5.30 and NMS at 10.79. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GF or NMS?: Over the past five years, NMS grew revenue faster — GF at a -42.09% CAGR versus NMS at 9.23%.
Does GF or NMS pay a bigger dividend?: GF yields 2.44% and NMS yields 6.91% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GF or NMS more profitable?: GF runs the higher net margin — GF at 1770.99% versus NMS at 130.68%.
How have GF and NMS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, GF delivered 5.01% and NMS delivered 0.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GF analysis Full NMS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

New Germany Fund P/E ratio Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund P/E ratio New Germany Fund dividend yield Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yield New Germany Fund ROE Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund ROE New Germany Fund operating margin Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund operating margin New Germany Fund revenue growth Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growth

New Germany Fund & Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 13, 2026.