The New Germany Fund, Inc. (GF) vs Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD)
NAD leads on 8 of 12 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of The New Germany Fund, Inc. and Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
GF
The New Germany Fund, Inc.
$11.65Financial Services
NAD
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund
$12.04Financial Services
Total return — GF vs NAD
growth of $100 · last 27yGF -3.4%NAD -19.7%GF compounded faster
GF NAD
GF vs NAD: by the numbers
- •NAD is the larger company ($2.81B vs $186M market cap).
- •NAD trades at the lower earnings multiple (4.87 vs 5.32 P/E).
- •GF converts more revenue to profit (286.83% vs 140.28% net margin).
- •NAD grew revenue faster over the past five years (-0.50% vs -3.04% CAGR).
- •NAD pays the higher dividend yield (7.03% vs 2.64%).
Which is better, GF or NAD?
Metric tally: GF 4 · NAD 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNAD(lower P/E)
GrowthNAD(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeNAD(higher dividend yield)
QualityGF(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GF | NAD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 5.32 | 4.87● |
| Forward P/E | 5.14 | — |
| P/S ratio | 15.30 | 6.85● |
| P/B ratio | 0.92● | 0.98 |
| PEG ratio | 0.02 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | GF | NAD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 38.92% | 93.93%● |
| Operating margin | 1763.53%● | 69.73% |
| Net margin | 286.83%● | 140.28% |
| ROE | 17.19% | 20.16%● |
| ROIC | 26.89%● | 2.93% |
Dividends
| Metric | GF | NAD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.64% | 7.03%● |
| Payout ratio | 8.98% | 302.14% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GF | NAD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -3.04% | -0.50%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -11.39% | -10.59%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -8.64% | 0.36%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, GF or NAD?
- It depends on your goal. value: NAD (lower P/E); growth: NAD (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NAD (higher dividend yield); quality: GF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NAD leads 8 to 4.
- Is GF or NAD cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NAD is cheaper: GF trades at a 5.32 P/E and NAD at 4.87.
- Which has grown faster, GF or NAD?
- Over the past five years, NAD grew revenue faster — GF at a -3.04% CAGR versus NAD at -0.50%.
- Does GF or NAD pay a bigger dividend?
- GF yields 2.64% and NAD yields 7.03% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is GF or NAD more profitable?
- GF runs the higher net margin — GF at 286.83% versus NAD at 140.28%.
- Which has been the better investment, GF or NAD?
- Over the past 10-year, GF delivered the higher annualized total return — GF at 5.85% versus NAD at 2.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
New Germany Fund P/E ratioNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund P/E ratioNew Germany Fund dividend yieldNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yieldNew Germany Fund ROENuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund ROENew Germany Fund operating marginNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund operating marginNew Germany Fund revenue growthNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growthNew Germany Fund free cash flowNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund free cash flow
New Germany Fund & Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.