On trailing earnings, GD is cheaper: GD trades at a 22.03 P/E and TT at 36.69.

Which has grown faster, GD or TT?

Over the past five years, TT grew revenue faster — GD at a 6.89% CAGR versus TT at 10.98%.

Does GD or TT pay a bigger dividend?

GD yields 1.74% and TT yields 0.84% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GD or TT more profitable?

TT runs the higher net margin — GD at 8.07% versus TT at 13.42%.

Which has been the better investment, GD or TT?

Over the past 10-year, TT delivered the higher annualized total return — GD at 12.03% versus TT at 26.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

General Dynamics Corporation (GD) vs Trane Technologies plc (TT)

GD leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of General Dynamics Corporation and Trane Technologies plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

General Dynamics Corporation

$94.74B

$350.34Industrials

Trane Technologies plc

$104.86B

$474.34Industrials

Total return — GD vs TT

growth of $100 · last 30y

GD +2093.7%TT +4079.2%TT compounded faster

GD TT

GD vs TT: by the numbers

•TT is the larger company ($104.86B vs $94.74B market cap).
•GD trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.03 vs 36.69 P/E).
•TT converts more revenue to profit (13.42% vs 8.07% net margin).
•TT grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.98% vs 6.89% CAGR).
•GD pays the higher dividend yield (1.74% vs 0.84%).

Which is better, GD or TT?

Metric tally: GD 9 · TT 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueGD(lower P/E)

GrowthTT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeGD(higher dividend yield)

QualityTT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GD	TT
P/E ratio	22.03●	36.69
Forward P/E	19.22●	27.87
P/S ratio	1.78●	4.90
P/B ratio	3.68●	12.29
PEG ratio	1.62●	2.06
EV / EBITDA	15.92●	25.64
FCF yield	6.46%●	2.99%

Profitability

Metric	GD	TT
Gross margin	15.24%	35.92%●
Operating margin	10.24%	18.17%●
Net margin	8.07%	13.42%●
ROE	16.65%	33.65%●
ROIC	10.58%	20.26%●

Dividends

Metric	GD	TT
Dividend yield	1.74%●	0.84%
Payout ratio	38.94%	30.40%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GD	TT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.89%	10.98%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	7.22%	29.75%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	11.42%●	11.10%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	15.85%	22.96%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, GD or TT?: It depends on your goal. value: GD (lower P/E); growth: TT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: GD (higher dividend yield); quality: TT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GD leads 9 to 8.
Is GD or TT cheaper?: On trailing earnings, GD is cheaper: GD trades at a 22.03 P/E and TT at 36.69.
Which has grown faster, GD or TT?: Over the past five years, TT grew revenue faster — GD at a 6.89% CAGR versus TT at 10.98%.
Does GD or TT pay a bigger dividend?: GD yields 1.74% and TT yields 0.84% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GD or TT more profitable?: TT runs the higher net margin — GD at 8.07% versus TT at 13.42%.
Which has been the better investment, GD or TT?: Over the past 10-year, TT delivered the higher annualized total return — GD at 12.03% versus TT at 26.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GD analysis Full TT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

General Dynamics P/E ratio Trane Technologies P/E ratio General Dynamics dividend yield Trane Technologies dividend yield General Dynamics ROE Trane Technologies ROE General Dynamics operating margin Trane Technologies operating margin General Dynamics revenue growth Trane Technologies revenue growth General Dynamics free cash flow Trane Technologies free cash flow

General Dynamics & Trane Technologies appear in these rankings

Dividend Aristocrats Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.