On trailing earnings, GD is cheaper: GD trades at a 22.61 P/E and PH at 33.91.

Which has grown faster, GD or PH?

Over the past five years, PH grew revenue faster — GD at a 6.89% CAGR versus PH at 9.15%.

Does GD or PH pay a bigger dividend?

GD yields 1.69% and PH yields 0.81% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GD or PH more profitable?

PH runs the higher net margin — GD at 8.07% versus PH at 16.58%.

Which has been the better investment, GD or PH?

Over the past 10-year, PH delivered the higher annualized total return — GD at 12.29% versus PH at 25.36%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

General Dynamics Corporation (GD) vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

PH leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though GD is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of General Dynamics Corporation and Parker-Hannifin Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

General Dynamics Corporation

$97.23B

$359.53Industrials

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

$115.86B

$918.86Industrials

Total return — GD vs PH

growth of $100 · last 30y

GD +2219.5%PH +4973.8%PH compounded faster

GD PH

GD vs PH: by the numbers

•PH is the larger company ($115.86B vs $97.23B market cap).
•GD trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.61 vs 33.91 P/E).
•PH converts more revenue to profit (16.58% vs 8.07% net margin).
•PH grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.15% vs 6.89% CAGR).
•GD pays the higher dividend yield (1.69% vs 0.81%).

Which is better, GD or PH?

Metric tally: GD 8 · PH 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueGD(lower P/E)

GrowthPH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeGD(higher dividend yield)

QualityPH(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GD	PH
P/E ratio	22.61●	33.91
Forward P/E	19.73●	26.99
P/S ratio	1.83●	5.60
P/B ratio	3.78●	8.05
PEG ratio	1.63	1.04●
EV / EBITDA	16.32●	22.51
FCF yield	6.29%●	3.13%

Profitability

Metric	GD	PH
Gross margin	15.24%	37.23%●
Operating margin	10.24%	20.87%●
Net margin	8.07%	16.58%●
ROE	16.65%	23.82%●
ROIC	10.58%	13.69%●

Dividends

Metric	GD	PH
Dividend yield	1.69%●	0.81%
Payout ratio	38.94%	26.89%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GD	PH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.89%	9.15%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	7.22%	24.00%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	11.42%●	8.25%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	15.76%	27.07%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, GD or PH?: It depends on your goal. value: GD (lower P/E); growth: PH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: GD (higher dividend yield); quality: PH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PH leads 9 to 8.
Is GD or PH cheaper?: On trailing earnings, GD is cheaper: GD trades at a 22.61 P/E and PH at 33.91.
Which has grown faster, GD or PH?: Over the past five years, PH grew revenue faster — GD at a 6.89% CAGR versus PH at 9.15%.
Does GD or PH pay a bigger dividend?: GD yields 1.69% and PH yields 0.81% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GD or PH more profitable?: PH runs the higher net margin — GD at 8.07% versus PH at 16.58%.
Which has been the better investment, GD or PH?: Over the past 10-year, PH delivered the higher annualized total return — GD at 12.29% versus PH at 25.36%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GD analysis Full PH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

General Dynamics P/E ratio Parker-Hannifin P/E ratio General Dynamics dividend yield Parker-Hannifin dividend yield General Dynamics ROE Parker-Hannifin ROE General Dynamics operating margin Parker-Hannifin operating margin General Dynamics revenue growth Parker-Hannifin revenue growth General Dynamics free cash flow Parker-Hannifin free cash flow

General Dynamics & Parker-Hannifin appear in these rankings

Dividend Aristocrats Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.